हिंदी

Assertion: Attempt to Commit an Offence Enough Does Not Result in Any Harm Should Also Be Punished - Mathematics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and other as Reason (R).
You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option.

Assertion: Attempt to commit an offence enough does not result in any harm should also be punished

Reason: A person who tries to cause prohibited harm and fails, is, in terms of moral culpability, not materially different from the person who tries and succeeds.

विकल्प

  • Both A and R are individually true and R is correct explanation to A

  • Both A and Rare individually true but R is not correct explanation of A

  • A is true but R is false

  • A is false but R is true

MCQ

उत्तर

Both A and R are individually true and R is correct explanation to A

shaalaa.com
Study of Law (Entrance Exams)
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
2014-2015 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्न

The question consists of two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and other as Reason (R).
You are to examine the two statements carefully and select the best option.

Assertion: Custom per se is law, independent of prior recognition by the sovereign or the judge.

Reason: Custom is source of Jaw but by itself is not law.


Read the definition and elements of the attempt, apply them on the given fact situations and answer the question:

Definition of Attempt: Lord Blackburn has said that "there is no doubt that there is difference between a preparation antecedent to an attempt and the actual attempt, but if the actual transaction has commenced which would have ended in the crime if not interrupted, there is clearly an attempt to commit the crime."

1. Fault element· Intention or knowledge requisite for committing an offense: and
2. Conduct Element: does any act towards its commission and has crossed the stage of preparation. This act is so closely connected with and proximate to the commission that it falls in object because of facts not known to him or because of circumstances beyond his control.

'JAM' denied food to his wife JANE for several days by keeping her confined in a room with an intention to accelerate her death. JANE ultimately managed to escape.


Principles:

• A person is said to abet the doing of a thing when he instigates any other person to do that thing.

• Mere acquiescence, however, does not amount to instigation.

Facts: 'A' says to 'B': I am going to kill 'C'." And, 'B' replies: "Do as you wish and take the consequences"; whereafter 'A' kills 'C'.


Legal phrase is followed by four meanings. Choose the most appropriate option:

Per incuriam


Mark the best option:
The right of a party to initiate an action and be heard before a Court of law is called


Mark the best option:
English Law is also known as


Mark the best option:
‘Res Judicata’ is a term used to describe -


Mark the best option:
A will or testament –


The following can be patented


Local self-governance is an example of


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×
Our website is made possible by ad-free subscriptions or displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
If you don't like ads you can support us by buying an ad-free subscription or please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker. Thank you.