हिंदी

Assertion: It is difficult to replace chlorine by –OH in chlorobenzene in comparison to that in chloroethane. Reason: Chlorine-carbon (C−Cl) bond in chlorobenzene has a partial double - Chemistry

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Assertion: It is difficult to replace chlorine by –OH in chlorobenzene in comparison to that in chloroethane.

Reason: Chlorine-carbon \[\ce{(C - Cl)}\] bond in chlorobenzene has a partial double bond character due to resonance.

विकल्प

  • Assertion and reason both are correct and reason is correct explanation of assertion.

  • Assertion and reason both are wrong statements.

  • Assertion is correct but reason is wrong statement.

  • Assertion is wrong but reason is correct statement.

  • Assertion and reason both are correct statements but reason is not correct explanation of assertion.

MCQ

उत्तर

Assertion and reason both are correct and reason is correct explanation of assertion.

Explanation:

The statement at assertion 'It is difficult to replace chlorine by -OH in chlorobenzene' is a correct statement and the statement given for reason (i.e. Chlorine - Carbon (C - Cl) bond in chlorobenzene has a partial double bond character due to resonance is also correct.

shaalaa.com
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
अध्याय 10: Haloalkanes and Haloarenes - Exercises [पृष्ठ १४८]

APPEARS IN

एनसीईआरटी एक्झांप्लर Chemistry [English] Class 12
अध्याय 10 Haloalkanes and Haloarenes
Exercises | Q V. 92. | पृष्ठ १४८

वीडियो ट्यूटोरियलVIEW ALL [1]

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×