Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Critically examine the limitations of the inscriptional evidence in understanding political and economic history of India.
संक्षेप में उत्तर
उत्तर
- Although several thousand inscriptions have been discovered, not all have been deciphered, published and translated.
- Many more inscriptions must have existed, which have not survived the ravages of time.
- The content of inscriptions almost invariably projects the perspective of the person(s) who, commissioned them.
- Routine agricultural practices and the joys and sorrows of daily existence find no mention in inscriptions.
- From the mid-twentieth century onwards, issues such as economic change, and the ways in which different social groups emerged have assumed far more importance for the historians which led to fresh investigations of old sources, and the development of new strategies of analysis.
- Thus, the inscriptions had limitations in interpreting the political and economic history of India.
shaalaa.com
The Limitations of Inscriptional Evidence
क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R):
Assertion (A): There are limits to what epigraphy can reveal.
Reason (R): It is not always easy to be sure about the exact meaning of the words used in inscriptions.
Which of the following are the limitations of inscriptional evidence?
Match the following advances in epigraphy with their approximate dates and select the correct option accordingly.
Advances in epigraphy | Approximate dates |
A. First issues of Epigraphia Carnatica | 1. 1784 |
B. First issue of Epigraphia Indica | 2. 1838 |
C. Founding of the Asiatic Society (Bengal) | 3. 1886 |
D. Decipherment of Brahmi by Prinsep | 4. 1888 |
Which of the following statement/s is/are true about the Importance of Inscriptions?
Explain the limitations of epigraphy.