Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Identify the argument which cannot be accepted.
पर्याय
All wives are married. Therefore, all married people are wives.
All unmarried women are spinsters. Therefore, all spinsters are women.
All equilateral triangles are equiangular. Therefore, all equiangular triangles are equilateral.
All rainy days are wet days. Therefore, all wet days are rainy days.
उत्तर
All wives are married. Therefore, all married people are wives.
Explanation:
All wives are married Therefore, all married people are wives cannot be accepted.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
The question contains two statements and two conclusions numbered I and II.
You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements.
Answer (1) If only conclusion I follows.
Answer (2) If only conclusion II follows.
Answer (3) If neither I nor II follows.
Answer (4) 1 f both I and II follows.
Statements:
I. Some players are singers.
II. All singers are tall.
Conclusions:
I. Some players are tall.
II. All players are tall.
Statement: The percentage of the national income shared by the top 10 percent of households in India is 35.
Conclusions:
I. When an economy grows fast, concentration of wealth in certain pockets of population takes place.
II. The national income is unevenly distributed in India.
Considering given statements as true, select a logical conclusion based on the given statements.
Statements:
- No tree is a flower
- Some trees are fruits
Conclusions:
- Fruits that are trees are not flowers.
- No fruit is a flower.
Statement: In a recent survey report, it has been stated that those who undertake physical exercise for at least half an hour a day are less prone to have any heart ailments.
Conclusions:
I. Moderate level of physical exercise is necessary for leading a healthy life.
II. All people who do desk-bound jobs definitely suffer from heart ailments.
In the question given below two statements numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements as true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
I: Karan Johar is a good director
II: Directors are intelligent.
The question contains four arguments of three sentences each Choose the set in which the third statement is a logical conclusion of the first two.
Argument 1. Shahrukh is an actor. Some actors are pretty. Shahrukh is pretty
Argument 2. Some executives are soldiers. All soldiers are patriotic. Some executives are patriotic.
Argument 3. All cricketers are patriotic. Some executives are soldiers. Some executives are patriotic.
Argument 4. All actors are pretty. Shahrukh is not an actor. Shahrukh is not pretty
In the questions below are given two statements followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they #seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements
- No bangle is an earring.
- Some earrings are rings.
Conclusions
- No ring is a bangle.
- Some rings are definitely not earrings.
The question below is given three statements followed by three conclusions I, II, and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements
- All keys are locks.
- All locks are bangles.
- All bangles are cars.
Conclusions
- Some cars are locks.
- Some bangles are keys.
- Some cars are keys.
The question contains four arguments of three sentences each. Choose the set in which the third statement is a logical conclusion of the first two.
Argument 1. All envelopes are rectangles. All rectangles are rectangular. All envelopes are rectangular.
Argument 2. Some thin are smart. Some smart things are tiny. Some thin are tiny.
Argument 3. Learned are well read. Well read know. Learned know.
Argument 4. Dieting is good for health. Health foods are rare. Dieting is rare.
In the question below are given two statements followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:
- All windows are doors.
- No door is wall.
conclusions
- No window is wall.
- No wall is door.
