Question

Mark the best option:
Principle: A person, who provides his services to another, needs to be paid for the same. In case he is not paid, he needs to become compensated by the person who availed his services.
Facts: Jack went to the restaurant to have dinner. After having a good meal he realized he didn't have enough money to pay for the bill. He told the manager of the restaurant about the problem. The manager asked him to give his watch and his Parker pen in lieu of the money for the bill. Is Jack liable to give his watch and pen instead of the money?

पर्याय

• No. He was being honest with the manager by telling him that he did not have money.

• No. The manager should have let him go back and return with the requisite amount

• Yes. Jack should have checked earlier if he had enough cash on him or not

• Yes. Jack availed the services at the restaurant and he is liable to compensate them for the same if he had no money to pay the bill.

Answer 1

Yes. Jack availed the services at the restaurant and he is liable to compensate them for the same if he had no money to pay the bill.
Jack is liable to pay as the restaurant had offered gratuitous services to him. he was not offered any pay later scheme.