Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Those public sector undertakings which are making profits should be privatised. Do you agree with this view? Why?
उत्तर
An efficient and profit earning PSU is a revenue generator for the government. But if, a PSU is an inefficient and loss making one, then the same PSU exerts unnecessary burden on the government's scarce revenues and further may lead to budget deficit. The loss making PSUs should be privatised whereas it would not be fair to privatise a profit making PSU. Privatising a PSU may lead to concentration of monopoly power in the private hands. Further some of the PSUs like, water, railways, etc. enhance the welfare of nation and is meant to serve general public at a very nominal cost. Privatisation of such important PSUs will lead to loss of welfare of poor people. Hence, only less important PSUs should be privatised while leaving the core and important PSUs to be owned by the public sector. Instead of privatisation of profit-making PSUs, government can allow more degree of autonomy and accountability in their operations, which will not only increase their productivity and efficiency but also enhance their competitiveness with their private counterparts.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
What do you understand by devaluation of rupee?
Distinguish between the following
Strategic and Minority sale
Do you think the navaratna policy of the government helps in improving the performance of public sector undertakings in India? How?
What are the major factors responsible for the high growth of the service sector?
Why has the industrial sector performed poorly in the reform period?
Which is the latest tax introduced by the government of India?
India’s post-1990 economic strategy entailed three important breaks with the past:
- To dismantle the vast network of controls and permits that dominated the economic system.
- To redefine the role of the state as a facilitator of economic transactions and as a neutral regulator rather than the primary provider of goods and services.
- To move away from a regime of import substitution and to integrate fully with the global trading system.
The 1991 reforms unleashed the energies of Indian entrepreneurs and gave untold choices to the consumers and changed the face of the Indian economy. The reform agenda constituted a paradigm shift and has defined the broad contours of economic policymaking for three decades.
Liberalization was adopted as the guiding principle of governance and all governments since 1991, have broadly stuck to that path.
Today we don’t need a paradigm shift. We need to look at individual sectors and see which one of these needs, reforms to create a competitive environment and improve efficiency. The power sector, the financial system, governance structures, and even agricultural marketing need reforms.
Today’s reforms also require much more discussion and consensus-building. The central government needs to work in tandem with state governments and consult different stakeholders impacted by reform decisions. Timing and sequencing are critically important in the new reforms’ agenda.
- According to the given text, ____________ was adopted as the guiding principle of governance and all governments since 1991.
Which of the following factors led RBI to change its role from the controller to facilitator of the financial sector in India?
An example of a direct tax is ______
In the above question 15, if exports change to X = 100, find the net export balance.
Inventory is a ______ concept whereas the change in inventory is a ______ concept.
Which of following is a direct tax?
Which of the following statements is not true regarding the benefit of GST?
The government encourages exports to correct excess capacity in the economy. This ma)l lead to:
The Non-tax revenue in the following is ______
What kind of Tax is GST?
Which one of the following is a combination of direct taxes?
Assertion (A): In 1991, as an immediate measure to resolve the Balance of Payments crisis, the rupee was devalued against foreign currencies.
Reason (R): Devaluation of currency was eminent, to replenish the deteriorated foreign exchange reserves.
