Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Consider
Statement 1: (p∧∼q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is a fallacy.
Statement 2: (p→q) ↔ (∼q→∼p) is a tautology.
Options
Statement-1 is true; Statement-2 is true; Statement-2 is a correct explanation for Statement-1
Statement-1 is true; Statement-2 is true; Statement-2 is not a correct explanation for Statement-1
Statement-1 is true; Statement-2 is false
Statement-1 is false; Statement-2 is true
MCQ
Fill in the Blanks
Solution
Statement-1 is true; Statement-2 is true; Statement-2 is not a correct explanation for Statement-1
Explanation:
Statement-1: (p∧∼q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q)
= p ∧∼p ∧∼q ∧ q
= f ∧ f
⇒ f
So, statement–1 is true
Statement-2: = (p→q) ↔ (p→q)
Which is always true
So, Statement –2 is true
shaalaa.com
Tautology, Contradiction, and Contingency
Is there an error in this question or solution?