Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Contrast a flexible constitution from a rigid constitution on the basis of process of Amendment. Cite an example to bring out the contrast between the two.
Answer in Brief
Solution
- Amendment: A Flexible constitution can be easily amended; A Rigid constitution cannot be easily amended.
- Procedure for Amendment for Flexible: Laws amended by a simple majority of both houses of Parliament, Amendment is passed by a specific and large majority of 2/3rd or 3/4th or an absolute majority of votes.
- Great Britain is a classic example of Flexible Constitution while the USA can be referred to as a rigid constitution. In Britian, any law can be passed by a simple majority of both the houses while in the USA two third majority and three fourth of the state legislature are prerequisites to amendment.
- There is no difference between ordinary law and constitutional law as it can be passed by a simple majority of Parliament in Great Britain. However, in the USA the law has to pass through Proposal and Ratification stages. The process of amendment is cumbersome in the USA but is simple in Britain.
shaalaa.com
Kinds of Constitutions - Written and Unwritten, Rigid and Flexible, Enacted and Evolved
Is there an error in this question or solution?
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Distinguish between a flexible constitution and a rigid constitution.
Distinguish between the bi-party system and a multi-party system.
Answer the question briefly.
Explain the following kinds of constitutions :
(i) Written
(ii) Unwritten
(iii) Enacted
(iv) Evolved
Answer the question briefly.
Is the distinction between a written constitution and an unwritten constitution a real one? Discuss.
Explain any three merits and any three demerits of a rigid constitution.
The Constitutional of the United States can be characterised as: