Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
“How was 'one party dominance' in India different from the 'one party system' of Mexico? In your opinion, which of the two political systems is better and why?
Solution
Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) earlier known as National Revolutionary Party was founded in 1929 and exercised power in Mexico for almost six decades. It represented the legacy of the Mexican Revolution. Originally, PRI consisted of various interests including political and military leaders, labour and peasant organisations and numerous political parties. Over a period of time, the founder of PRI, Plutarco Elias Calles captured the organisation and in this manner the government too.
- Elections were held at regular intervals, and it was the PRI which won every time.
- Other parties existed in name only so as to give the ruling party greater legitimacy.
- The electoral laws were operated in a manner so as to ensure that the PRI always won.
- Elections were often rigged and manipulated by the ruling party.
- Its rule was described as ‘the perfect dictatorship’.
- Finally, the party lost in the Presidential Elections held in 2000.
Mexico was no longer a one-party dominated country. However, the tactics adopted by the PRI during the period of its dominance had a long-term effect on the health of democracy. The citizens have yet to develop full confidence in the system of democracy and the fair nature of elections.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Match the following leaders listed in List A with the parties in List B.
| List A | List B |
| (a) S.A. Dange | i. Bharatiya Jana Sangh |
| (b) Shyama Prasad Mukherjee | ii. Swatantra Party |
| (c) Minoo Masani | iii. Praja Socialist Party |
| (d) Asoka Mehta | iv. Communist Party of India |
The statement regarding one-party dominance is given below. Mark it as true or false.
One-party dominance occurs because of weak public opinion.
The statement regarding one-party dominance is given below. Mark it as true or false.
One-party dominance is linked to the nation’s colonial past.
The statement regarding one-party dominance is given below. Mark it as true or false.
One-party dominance reflects the absence of democratic ideals in a country.
The statement regarding one-party dominance is given below. Mark it as true or false.
One-party dominance is rooted in the absence of strong alternative political parties.
If Bharatiya Jana Sangh of the Communist Party of India had formed the government after the first election, in which respects would the policies of the government have been different? Specify three differences each for both the parties.
Did the prevalence of a ‘one-party dominant system’ affect adversely the democratic nature of Indian politics?
Bring out three differences each between Bharatiya Jana Sangh and Swatantra Party.
Bring out three differences each between Socialist parties and the Communist party.
The term 'partisan' means:
A recognised political party is-
Which of the following statements is/are correct in the context of the dominance of the Congress Party in the first three general elections?
- The Congress party had inherited the legacy of the national movement. It had a great leader Jawaharlal Nehru who led the Congress campaign and toured throughout the country.
- Congress party won 364 of the 489 seats in the first Lok Sabha and finished way ahead of any other challenger. Jawaharlal Nehru became the Prime Minister after the first general election.
- The state elections were held with the Lok Sabha elections. Congress scored a big victory in those elections as well. The party ruled all over the country at the national and the state level.
- In the second and the third general elections, held in 1957 and 1962 respectively, the Congress maintained the same position in the Lok Sabha by winning three-fourths of the seats.
The feature of one-party dominance in the Indian party system was temporarily set aside by the ______
