Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
HOT Question
Neelan and Mala are having a conversation about our Universe. Neelan is telling our earth will be the only planet in the entire Universe to have a life with. But, Mala is opposing his view by citing certain points. What would be the argument of Mala. Do you support Mala? Justify your stand.
Solution
I would like to support Neelan, because Life is possible only on the Earth due to presence of water, oxygen, various gases and suitable temperature, which enables us to live.
Mala opposed Neelan’s view based on the following points :
- Like the Sun, there might be billions of other stars with their own planets revolving around them.
- Thus there are many chances of any planet getting the suitable conditions for supporting life.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
The Equator faces the Sun directly on ______ and ______.
What do you know about Universe?
Match the following:
| 1. Ringed planet | (a) Earth |
| 2. Blue planet | (b) Mars |
| 3. Smallest planet | (c) Mercury |
| 4. Earth's Twin | (d) Venus |
| 5. Red Planet | (e) Saturn |
The only evidence of the big bang theory is?
The Big Bang occurred ______ years ago.
What is meant by light year?
The average distance between the Earth and the Sun is called an ______.
Explain the origin of the universe.
Billions of galaxies from the ______.
How is Sun formed according to the Big Bang theory?
