Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
The doctor is a person who looks after the sick people and prescribes medicines so that the patient recovers fast. In order to become a doctor, a person has to study medicine. Doctors lead a hard life. Their life is very busy. They get up early in the morning and go to the hospital. They work without taking a break. They always remain polite so that patients feel comfortable with them. Since doctors work so hard we must realise their value.
Based on the above paragraph, who among the following is/are doctor(s)?
i. Kumar Sharma wakes up early in the morning every day and treats everyone with patience. He usually gives emergency aid to the persons who are injured in accidents. ii. Rakesh studied medicine in Russia and practiced medicine there for 2 years. Later, stopped medical practice and turned into some business.
iii. Shalini works in Apollo Hospitals. She always remains polite so that patients feel comfortable. She is a specialist in providing quality care for cancer patients.
Options
All are doctors
Rakesh and Shalini are the doctors
Kumar Sharma and Rakesh are doctors
Only Rakesh is a doctor
Solution
Only Rakesh is a doctor
Explanation:
Of all the given options, only Rakesh has studied medicine and practised it.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Instructions for Question: Read the information given below to answer the question.
A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H want to have dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements.
(a) A will sit beside C.
(b) H will sit beside A.
(c) C will sit beside E.
(d) F will sit beside H.
(e) E will sit beside G.
(f) D will sit beside F.
(g) G will sit beside B.
(h) B will sit beside D.
Which of the following is wrong?
Recently, the answers to a test held nationwide were leaked to a group of unscrupulous people. The investigative agency has arrested the mastermind and nine other people A, B, C, D, E, F, G, Hand I in this matter. interrogating them, the following facts have been obtained regarding their operation. Initially, the mastermind obtains the correct answer-key. AU the others create their answer-key from one or two people who already possess the same. These people are called his/her "'sources". If the person has two sources. then he/she compares the answer-keys obtained for both sources. If the key to a question from both sources is identical, it is copied, otherwise, it is left blank. If the person has only one source, he/she copies the source's answer into his/her copy. Finally, each person compulsorily replaces one of the answers (not a blank one) with a wrong answer in his/her answer key.
The paper contained 200 questions; so the investigative agency has ruled out the possibility of two or more of them introducing wrong answers to the same question. The investigative agency has a copy of the correct answer key and has tabulated the following data. This data represents question numbers.
| Name | Wrong Answer(s) | Blank Answer(s) |
| A | 45 | ___ |
| B | 96 | 46, 90, 25 |
| C | 27, 56 | 17, 46, 90 |
| D | 17 | ____ |
| E | 46, 90 | ____ |
| F | 14, 46 | 92, 90 |
| G | 25 | ____ |
| H | 46, 92 | ____ |
| I | 27 | 17, 26, 90 |
Which of the following two groups of people has identical sources?
1) A, D and G
2) E and H
The question is based on a situation. Read the situation and answer the question that follows
Between 1960 and 1970, ivory poachers in the African nation of Zinbaku killed over 6,500 elephants. During that period, the total elephant population in Zinbaku fell from about 35,000 to just under 30,000. In 1970, new anti-poaching measures were implemented in Zinbaku, and between 1970 and 1980 over 800 poachers were arrested and expelled from the country. Nevertheless, by 1980, the elephant population in Zinbaku had fallen to about 21,000.
Which of the following, if true, would best help to explain the apparent paradox presented above?
Choose the most appropriate option for the following question.
Vaishnavi prefers Economics to Maths, English to Social science, and Political Science to History. If she prefers Maths to History, and Social science to Maths, which is Vaishnavi’s least preferred subject?
In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to distinguish between a 'strong' argument and a 'weak' argument. A 'strong' argument must be both important and directly related to the question. A 'weak' argument may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is 'strong' and which is 'weak'.
Statement
- Should there be only a uniform rate of income tax irrespective of the level of income?
Arguments
- Yes, this will substantially reduce the work of the officials of the income tax department.
-
No, this will reduce government tax collection to a large extent.
The question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement.
Statement As poor people in India prefer and use jaggery rather than sugar, the government has decided to decontrol and scrap sugar distribution through the Public Distribution System (PDS).
Assumptions
- Jaggery is freely available at a reasonable price to all poor people.
- PDS has lost its utility.
In the question given below, there is a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
Statement
- The majority of Indian labourers belong to the unorganised sector and most of them earn very low.
Conclusions
- The labourers belonging to the organised sector have better benefits and stability.
- Some labourers belonging to the unorganised sector have a regular and certain income.
The following question, two statements are given followed by two or three Conclusions I, II, and III. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any follow from the given statements
Statements
- Science has brought gadgets of happiness, prosperity, and wealth.
- Science has not solved the problems of overpopulation.
Conclusions
- Overpopulation is due to unscientific thinking.
- Science has not helped world peace.
The question has a main statement, followed by four statements labeled I, II, III, and IV. Choose the ordered pair of statements, where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logical with the main statement.
Whenever Vijay reads late into the night, his grandfather reprimands him.
- His grandfather does not reprimand Vijay.
- Vijay reads late into the night.
- Vijay reads early in the morning.
- Vijay's grandfather reprimands him in the morning.
The questions below are given a statement followed by two courses of action. The course of action is a step for administrative the decision to be taken for improvement, follow-up, or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the given suggested courses of action is/are logically worth pursuing.
Statement An unacceptable number of children die during the first year of their lives. The high incidence of infant death is a major cause of concern for the health ministry.
Course of Action
- All government hospitals should be privatised to improve health care facilities.
- The government should commit higher levels of its budget to health services.
