Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
What was distinctive about Eco's academic writing style?
Solution
Umberto Eco's academic writing style is quite distinctive. It has a certain playful and personal quality about it. It is a marked departure from a regular academic style which is usually depersonalised and often dry and boring.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Answer the following in 125-150 words:
What made the American publisher think that the novel, ‘The Name of the Rose’ won’t sell well in America? What actually happened? What was the secret of its success?
Answer the following in 125-150 words:
What made the American publisher think that the novel, ‘The Name of the Rose’ won’t sell well in America? What actually happened? What was the secret of its success?
What are some of the positive views on interviews?
Why do most celebrity wnters despise being interviewed?
What is the belief in some primitive cultures about being photographed?
What do you understand by the expression "thumbprints on his windpipe'?
Who, in today's world, is our chief source of information about personalities?
Do you think Umberto Eco likes being interviewed? Give reasons for your opinion.
How does Eco find the time to write so much?
Did Umberto Eco consider himself a novelist first or an academic scholar?
What is the reason for the huge success of the novel, The Name of the Rose?
Discuss in pairs or small groups.
Talk about any interview that you have watched on television or read in a newspaper. How did it add to your understanding of the celebrity, the interviewer and the field of the celebrity?
Discuss in pairs or small groups.
The medium you like best for an interview, print, radio, or television .
Discuss in pairs or small groups.
Every famous person has a right to his or her privacy Interviewers sometimes embarrass celebrities with very personal questions.
Answer the following question in about 40-50 words.
Umberto Eco, with reference to "The Name of the Rose" says, “I think if I had written The Name of the Rose ten years earlier or ten years later, it wouldn’t have been the same.” What could he have meant?
Read the following extract and answer the questions that follow:
| Similarly, we have a lot of empty spaces in our lives. I call them interstices. Say you are coming over to my place. You are in an elevator and while you are coming up, I am waiting for you. This is an interstice, an empty space. I work in empty spaces. While waiting for your elevator to come up from the first to the third floor, I have already written an article! |
- Umberto Eco was ______. (1)
- a professor of semiotics, an author
- an interviewer, a novelist
- a journalist, a professor
- a publisher, an author
- Rationalise, to support the given statement: (1)
Similarly, we have a lot of empty spaces in our lives. - Rewrite the sentence by replacing the underlined phrase with its inference: (1)
I call them interstices. - On the basis of the extract, study the two statements, I and II given below: (1)
I. Umberto Eco works even in the spare time between activities.
II. Umberto Eco does not like to be interviewed.
Choose the most appropriate option:- I can be inferred from the extract, but II cannot.
- I cannot be inferred from the extract, but II can.
- I and II are true.
- II is the reason for I.
- Replace the underlined word with its antonym from the extract. (1)
Umberto Eco does not like to waste time. He writes an article while he is proceeding to the elevator. - Umberto Eco's views on his manner of work, are based on ______. (1)
- facts
- an interview
- his blog
- hypothesis
