Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
What were the main arguments put forward by different MLAs who thought that the government was not taking the situation in a serious manner?
Solution
The main arguments put forward by different MLAs were the following:
- The government cannot prevent problems like diarrhoea which has caused 15 deaths in Akhandagaon.
- There is a bad condition in government hospitals, but the government is not appointing a sufficient number of doctors and other medical staff there.
- There is a severe shortage of water in the Tolpatti constituency. Women have to travel up to 3 to 4 kilometres to fetch water. The government is not providing the tankers required to supply water. Ponds and wells have not been cleaned and disinfected.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Why should decisions are taken by the Chief Minister and other ministers be debated in the Legislative Assembly?
Very Short Type Question:
How will you define a Legislative Assembly?
Very Short Type Question:
Why do people in a democratic set up organise meetings?
Very Short Type Question:
The government works at three levels. Name them.
Short Type Question:
What do you mean by an MLA? Is it necessary to become a member of any political party to become an MLA?
Can you identify the MLAs of the ruling party and the opposition in the illustration? Colour the ruling party in one colour and the opposition in another.
If you were the health minister, how would you respond to the above discussion?
Do you think the above debate would have been useful in some ways? How? Discuss.
In the working of the government, explain the difference between being an MLA and an MLA who is also a minister.
