Question

Which of the following statements, are true regarding the jurisdiction of the High Court?

I. High Court can punish for its contempt.
II. High Court tender advice on the legal question referred to it by the Governor of the State.
III. High Court confirms the death sentences passed by lower judiciary.
IV. High Court can issue writs for enforcement of Fundamental rights.

Options

• I, IV

• I, II, III

• I, II, IV

• I, III, IV

Answer 1

I, III, IV

Explanation:

Like Supreme Court, the high court has original jurisdiction in matters of enforcement of fundamental rights. Further, it has original jurisdiction in matters related to the admiralty, will, marriage, divorce, company laws and contempt of court. It also has similar jurisdiction in matters related to the election of MPs and MLAs. Article 226 empowers the High Court with writ jurisdiction for the enforcement of fundamental rights as well as any other matter within the territory of its jurisdiction. The difference between Supreme Court (article 32) and High Court  (article 226) is that while Supreme Court can issue writs only for the enforcement of fundamental rights, the high court can issue writs for other matters also.  The High Court hears the appeals against the subordinate courts in both civil and criminal matters.  High court has the power of superintendence over all courts and tribunals within its territorial jurisdiction except military courts or tribunals. It also has the power to transfer the cases from other subordinate courts in the state to itself.