Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Write ‘Ernest’ or ‘Poet’, against statement below.
He lacked faith in his own thoughts.
Solution
He lacked faith in his own thoughts.-Poet
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Do you think the Indian princes were short-sighted in their approach to the events of 1757?
Answer the following question.
What were the “symbols of reverence” left by members of the team on Everest?
Why does Jody want to bring the fawn home?
Answer the following question.
Complete the following sentences taking their appropriate parts from both the boxes below.
(i) There was his assistant on the line …
(ii) You get fed up with people asking you to be brave, …
(iii) There he was, …
(iv) You look at his eyes which can speak, …
(v) It doesn’t do much good to know …
A |
|
.
B |
|
Complete the sentence below by using an appropriate phrase from the ones given below.
The man was ___________ ___________ to offer help.
The camel was looking at his own reflection in the pool. What does it suggest to you about the camel?
Velu stood on the platform but he felt “as if he was still on a moving train.” Why?
How did he escape the ticket collector’s attention?
“If you are not careful, you will soon be counting bars there,” the girl said.
What does she mean when she says “If you are not careful...”? (She says something a little later which means the same. Find that sentence.)
The Giant saw a most wonderful sight. What did he see?
Describe their second meeting after a long interval.
Hafeez Contractor wanted to join the police force. Why didn’t he?
What do the reactions indicate about the nature and temperament of each?
How did the Maids of Honour come to know that the Princess and the bird had become intimate friends?
Princess September kept her window open day and night.
(i) How did it help the bird?
Which, to you, is the most important idea in this story, and why?
Now that they are at the pool, why don’t they continue the fight?
What was the consequence of buying jalebis with the fees money?
His prayer to God is like a lawyer’s defence of a bad case. Does he argue his case well? What are the points he makes?