हिंदी

Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as ______. - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as ______.

विकल्प

  • Commutative law

  • Associative law

  • De-Morgan's law

  • Distributive law

MCQ
रिक्त स्थान भरें

उत्तर

Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as distributive law.

shaalaa.com
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
अध्याय 1: Mathematical Logic - Miscellaneous Exercise 1 [पृष्ठ २९]

APPEARS IN

बालभारती Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] 12 Standard HSC Maharashtra State Board
अध्याय 1 Mathematical Logic
Miscellaneous Exercise 1 | Q 1.03 | पृष्ठ २९

संबंधित प्रश्न

If A = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, then which of the following is not true?

(A) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 3 = 8

(B) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 5

(C) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 9

(D) ∀ x ∈ A such that x + 6 ≥ 9


Write the truth value of the negation of the following statement : 

cos2 θ + sin2 θ = 1, for all θ ∈ R 


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

If a man is a judge then he is honest.


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

It 2 is a rational number then `sqrt2` is irrational number.


Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.

It f(2) = 0 then f(x) is divisible by (x – 2).


Without using truth table prove that:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ∼ q) ≡ p ∨ q


Without using truth table prove that:

∼ [(p ∨ ∼ q) → (p ∧ ∼ q)] ≡ (p ∨ ∼ q) ∧ (∼ p ∨ q)


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

p ↔ q ≡ ∼(p ∧ ∼q) ∧ ∼(q ∧ ∼p)


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

∼p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p


Using rules in logic, prove the following:

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ≡ ∼p


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ ∼r)


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

p ∧ (q ∨ r)


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(p → q) ∧ r


Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:

(∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ∼q)


Without using truth table, show that

p ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


Without using truth table, show that

p ∧ [(~ p ∨ q) ∨ ~ q] ≡ p


Using the algebra of statement, prove that

(p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q) ≡ (p ∨ ~ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ q)


The statement pattern p ∧ ( q v ~ p) is equivalent to ______.


For any two statements p and q, the negation of the expression (p ∧ ∼q) ∧ ∼p is ______ 


(p → q) ∨ p is logically equivalent to ______ 


The logically equivalent statement of (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r) is ______ 


The negation of p → (~p ∨ q) is ______ 


The statement pattern p ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is ______.


(p ∧ ∼q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is a ______.


The logical statement [∼(q ∨ ∼r) ∨ (p ∧ r)] ∧ (q ∨ p) is equivalent to: ______ 


Without using truth table, prove that:

[p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [∼r ∧ ∼q ∧ p] ≡ p


Without using truth table, prove that : [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] →q is a tautology.


The simplified form of [(~ p v q) ∧ r] v [(p ∧ ~ q) ∧ r] is ______.


The statement p → (q → p) is equivalent to ______.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×