Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Using the algebra of statement, prove that
(p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q) ≡ (p ∨ ~ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ q)
उत्तर
L.H.S. = (p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q)
≡ [p ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q)] ∨ [q ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q)] ...[Distributive law]
≡ [(p ∧ ~ p) ∨ (p ∧ ~ q)] ∨ [(q ∧ ~ p) ∨ (q ∧ ~ q)] ...[Distributive law]
≡ [c ∨ (p ∧ ~ q)] ∨ [(q ∧ ~ p) ∨ c] ...[Complement law]
≡ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (q ∧ ~ p) ...[Identity law]
≡ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ...[Commutative law]
= R.H.S.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
The negation of p ∧ (q → r) is ______________.
Using the rules of negation, write the negatlon of the following:
(a) p ∧ (q → r)
(b) ~P ∨ ~q
Write the truth value of the negation of the following statement :
cos2 θ + sin2 θ = 1, for all θ ∈ R
Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.
It 2 is a rational number then `sqrt2` is irrational number.
Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.
It f(2) = 0 then f(x) is divisible by (x – 2).
Without using truth table prove that:
(p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ∼ q) ≡ p
Without using truth table prove that:
∼ [(p ∨ ∼ q) → (p ∧ ∼ q)] ≡ (p ∨ ∼ q) ∧ (∼ p ∨ q)
Using rules in logic, prove the following:
p ↔ q ≡ ∼(p ∧ ∼q) ∧ ∼(q ∧ ∼p)
Using rules in logic, prove the following:
∼p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p
Using rules in logic, prove the following:
∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ≡ ∼p
Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:
p ∧ (q ∨ r)
Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:
(p → q) ∧ r
Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:
(∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ∼q)
Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as ______.
Without using truth table, show that
p ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)
Without using truth table, show that
p ∧ [(~ p ∨ q) ∨ ~ q] ≡ p
Without using truth table, show that
~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q] ≡ p ∧ q
Without using truth table, show that
~r → ~ (p ∧ q) ≡ [~ (q → r)] → ~ p
Without using truth table, show that
(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Using the algebra of statement, prove that
[p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [~ r ∧ ~ q ∧ p] ≡ p
Using the algebra of statement, prove that
(p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q) ≡ (p ∨ ~ q)
The statement pattern p ∧ ( q v ~ p) is equivalent to ______.
For any two statements p and q, the negation of the expression (p ∧ ∼q) ∧ ∼p is ______
(p → q) ∨ p is logically equivalent to ______
The negation of p → (~p ∨ q) is ______
The negation of the Boolean expression (r ∧ ∼s) ∨ s is equivalent to: ______
The logical statement [∼(q ∨ ∼r) ∨ (p ∧ r)] ∧ (q ∨ p) is equivalent to: ______
If p ∨ q is true, then the truth value of ∼ p ∧ ∼ q is ______.
The simplified form of [(~ p v q) ∧ r] v [(p ∧ ~ q) ∧ r] is ______.
Without using truth table prove that
[(p ∧ q ∧ ∼ p) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ ∼ q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ r
The statement p → (q → p) is equivalent to ______.
