Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
To what would you attribute the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s schemes – personal character or prevailing conditions? Give reasons for your answer.
उत्तर
Both personal character and prevailing conditions were responsible for the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq. On the personal side, he lacked practical sense and was not able to predict things whereas, on the other side, conditions prevailing were also not favourable. People were backward and did not respond to new ideas and radical reforms.
संबंधित प्रश्न
Important Words:
Devagiri
Fill in the blank:
Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq introduced ________ coins in place of gold and silver coins
Fill in the blanks:
Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq was an ___________ administrator and a ________ military commander.
Match the Columns:
| A | B |
| 1. Jalaluddin Khilji | (a) Shahna |
| 2. Alauddin Khilji | (b) Malwa |
| 3. Chanderi | (c) a mild and pious man |
| 4. Warangal | (d) a briliant general and a shrewd administrator |
| 5. Price Control | (e) Deccan |
| 6. Firoz Shah Tuqhlaq | (f) Afghan |
| 7. Sikandar Lodi | (g) Welfare schemes |
Choose the correct answer:
Most historians have traced the failure of Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s schemes to his _____________.
State whether the following is true or false:
Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s of increasing the taxes in the Ganga-Yamuna Doab region led to the development of agriculture in that region
Mention any one economic reform introduced in the Doab region by Firoze Shah Tughlaq.
Give one example to show that Firoze Shah was concerned about the welfare of his poor subjects.
What arrangements did Muhammad bin Tughlaq make to achieve his ambition of a world empire? Why did his scheme fail?
Why did Muhammad bin Tughlaq abandon his scheme of territorial expansion?
