मराठी

Instructions for Question: the Following Question Has a Main Statement Followed by Four Statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the Ordered Pair of Statements Where - Mathematics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Instructions for Question:  

The following question has a main statement followed by four statements: 1, 2, 3, 4. Choose the ordered pair of statements where the first statement implies the second, and the two statements are logically consistent with the main statement. 

Main statement: Either X or Y will take the only computer in the room. 

1. X took the computer. 
2. Y did not take the computer. 
3. X did not take the computer. 
4. Y took the computer. 

The ordered pair of statements is: 

पर्याय

  • 3, 1 

  • 1, 3 

  • 4, 3 

  • 1, 2 

MCQ

उत्तर

1, 2 

Explanation:

Two statement that follows main statement are 1 and 2. X took the computer and, Y did not take the computer.

shaalaa.com
Analytical and Logical Reseasoning
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
2018-2019 (May) Set 1

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

Find the odd-man-out:


Read the following information carefully and choose the most appropriate option:

A and B are good at driving bus and car. C and A are good at driving car and scooter. C, D and E are good at driving scooter and tractor. E and C are good at driving scooter and auto­ rickshaw. D and B are good at driving bus and tractor.

Who is good at driving scooter, tractor and bus?


Choose the most appropriate option:

A, B, C and D have got some money with them. If A gives 8 rupees to B, B will have as much as C has and A will have 3 rupees less than what C has. Also if A takes 6 rupees from C, A will have twice as much money as D. If B and D together have 50 rupees, how much money does A and B have respectively?


The question contains six statements followed by four sets of combinations of three. Choose the set, which gives the most logical triad. i.e. the third statement mentioned should be a conclusion drawn from the first two statements.

Statements:

  1. Some men are of short- height.
  2. Short-heighted men are intelligent.
  3. Sudhir is a man.
  4. Sudhir is of short-height.
  5. Sudhir is intelligent.
  6. AII men are intelligent.

Paw : Cat :: Hoof : ?


Architect : Building :: Sculptor : ?


Cloth : Mill :: Newspaper : ?


Given below is a passage followed by a statement about that passage. You must select one of the following answers:
Mediators recognize that the law is generally in place to uphold mediator - client confidentiality, however, there are situations that may occur where the mediator is under obligation to break that confidence. This obligation can vary depending upon where the mediator is practicing and it may occur as a result of their employment contract or of the law. Where such an issue does occur, the mediator is expected to firstly try and discuss the presenting issue with their client; however, in situations where the factors under consideration are particularly urgent, it is accepted that this cannot always be the case.
Legitimate breaches of confidentiality relate to circumstances where the information the client has shared relates to anti-national activities; information of this nature must be reported. There are other circumstances where breaching confidentiality may be considered legitimate, for example, in the case of serious crime or suspected child abuse. Mediation service providers and mediators practicing independently have their own boundaries but must agree with this contractually with their client at the outset of the client - counsel relationship.
Mediators have some flexibility regarding what they deem serious enough to lead them to breach confidentiality.

In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Statement Should the salary and perquisites of the public sector undertaking employees be made equivalent to those in the private sector?

Arguments

  1. Yes, this will help the public sector undertaking to attract and retain a competent workforce.
  2. No, public sector undertakings cannot afford to pay salaries to the level of the private sector.
  3. Yes, otherwise the public sector undertakings will not be able to compete with the private sector organisations.

In making a decision about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. The question below is followed by three arguments numbered I, II, and ill. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Statement

  • Should the salary and perquisites of public sector undertaking employees be made equivalent to those in the private sector?

Arguments

  1. Yes, this will help the public sector undertaking to attract and retain a competent workforce.
  2. No, public sector undertakings cannot afford to pay salaries to the level of the private sector.
  3. Yes, otherwise the public sector undertakings will not be able to compete with the private sector organisations.

Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×