मराठी

NAM Was Considered a ‘Third Option’ by Third World Countries. How Did this Option Benefit Their Growth During the Peak of the Cold War? - Political Science

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

NAM Was Considered a ‘Third Option’ by Third World Countries. How Did this Option Benefit Their Growth During the Peak of the Cold War? 

टीपा लिहा

उत्तर

Non-alignment offered newly decolonised countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America, a third option—not to join either alliance. A majority of NAM members was categorised as the Least Development Countries (LDCs), to be developed more economically not to remain dependent on richer countries. A new International Economic Order (NIEO) originated with this realisation. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) brought out a report in 1972 entitled towards a New Trade Policy for Development which proposed a reform of global trading system:

 1. LDCs got control over their own natural resources which were being exploited by developed western countries.

 2. To make western market available for LDCs to make trade more beneficial.

 3. To reduce cost of-technology from western countries.

 4. To provide LDCs with a greater role in international economic institutions.

shaalaa.com
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
पाठ 1: The Cold War Era - Exercises [पृष्ठ १६]

APPEARS IN

एनसीईआरटी Political Science - Contemporary World Politics [English] Class 12
पाठ 1 The Cold War Era
Exercises | Q 9 | पृष्ठ १६

व्हिडिओ ट्यूटोरियलVIEW ALL [1]

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

Name any two foreign leaders, along with the countries they belonged to, who are recognized as the founders of the Non-aligned Movement.


‘Non-aligned Movement (NAM) has become irrelevant today'. Do you agree with the statement? Support your answer with any three suitable arguments.


Read the given passage carefully and answer the following questions:

Non-alignment as a strategy evolved in the Cold War context.... with the disintegration of USSR and the end of Cold War in 1991, non-alignment, both, as an international movement and as the core of India's foreign policy, lost some of its earlier relevance and effectiveness.

  1. Why did India adopt non-alignment?
  2. Explain any two reasons for the loss of its relevance by the Nan Aligned Movement
  3. How far do you agree that the Non-Aligned Movement has become an international movement?

"Non-alignment does not imply neutrality or equidistance." What does this statement mean?


What was the main objective of the New International Economic Order?


What is the relevance of the Non-aligned Movement after the end of Cold War? Explain.


Which among the following statements does not reflect the objectives of NAM?


Which one of the following is an agreement signed between the two superpowers starting in the 1960s?


Which of these statements about the Non-Aligned Movement is incorrect?


The roots of NAM went back to the friendship between three leaders - Yugoslavia's Josip Broz Tito, India's Jawaharlal Nehru, and Egypt's leader.


The first NAM was held in ______


Identify the leader who was not a founder member of NAM (Non-Aligned Movement).


The First Non-Aligned Summit was held at ______.


Which one of the following statements about the NonAligned Movement is NOT correct?


The founder of NAM, Sukarno was from Indonesia, Joseph Broz Tito from ______ and Kwame Nkrumah from ______.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×