Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
The question contains two statements and two conclusions numbered I and II.
You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements.
Answer (1) If only conclusion I follows.
Answer (2) If only conclusion II follows.
Answer (3) If neither I nor II follows.
Answer (4) 1 f both I and II follows.
Statements:
I. Some vegetables are fruits.
II. No fruit is black.
Conclusions:
I. Some fruits are vegetables.
II. No vegetable is black.
पर्याय
Answer (1)
Answer (2)
Answer (3)
Answer (4)
उत्तर
Answer (1)
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
The question contains two statements and two conclusions numbered I and II.
You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements.
Answer (1) If only conclusion I follows.
Answer (2) If only conclusion II follows.
Answer (3) If neither I nor II follows.
Answer (4) 1 f both I and II follows.
Statements:
I. Some players are singers.
II. All singers are tall.
Conclusions:
I. Some players are tall.
II. All players are tall.
The passage below is followed by a question based on it. Read the passage choose the best answer to the question.
A study of native-born residents in Delhi found that two-thirds of the children developed considerable levels of nearsightedness after starting school, while their illiterate parents and grandparents, who had no opportunity for formal schooling, showed no signs of this disability.
If the above statements are true, which of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by them?
Statement: The percentage of the national income shared by the top 10 percent of households in India is 35.
Conclusions:
I. When an economy grows fast, concentration of wealth in certain pockets of population takes place.
II. The national income is unevenly distributed in India.
Statement: Domestic demand has been increasing faster than the production of indigenous crude oil.
Conclusions:
I. Crude oil must be imported.
II. Domestic demand should be reduced
Considering given statements as true, select a logical conclusion based on the given statements.
Statements:
- All boots are sandals.
- No sandal is shoe.
- All shoes are rings.
Conclusions:
- Some boots are rings.
- All sandals are boots.
- Some rings are sandals.
- All rings are shoes
In the question, a few statements are followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. Consider the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusion(s) and then decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the given statements.
Statements:
- All mirrors are phones.
- Some phones are gadgets.
- All gadgets are mirrors.
Conclusions:
- Some gadgets are phones.
- Some gadgets are mirrors.
- Some gadgets are not mirrors.
- Some phones are mirrors.
Statement: This world is neither good nor evil; each man manufactures a world for himself.
Conclusions:
I. Some people find this world quite good.
II. Some people find this world quite bad.
Identify the argument which cannot be accepted.
The question contains four arguments of three sentences each. Choose the set in which the third statement is a logical conclusion of the first two.
Argument 1. Sharukh is an actor. Some actors are pretty. Shahrukh is pretty.
Argument 2. Some executives are soldiers. All soldiers are patriotic. Some executives are patriotic.
Argument 3. All cricketers are patriotic. Some executives are soldiers. Some executives are patriotic.
Argument 4. All actors are pretty. Shahrukh is not an actor. Shahrukh is not pretty.
In the question below are given two statements followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.
Statements:
- All windows are doors.
- No door is wall.
conclusions
- No window is wall.
- No wall is door.
