English

An activist working among the poor says that the poor don’t need Fundamental Rights. What they need are Directive Principles to be made legally binding. Do you agree with this? Give your reasons - Political Science

Advertisements
Advertisements

Question

An activist working among the poor says that the poor don’t need Fundamental Rights. What they need are Directive Principles to be made legally binding. Do you agree with this? Give your reasons

Answer in Brief

Solution

Any answer supported with argument or explanation would solve the purpose. It is strongly recommended that you prepare the solution on your own. However, one sample solution has been provided for your reference:

  • No, I do not agree with this statement. Fundamental Rights cannot be denied to any section of the society and this is applicable to the poorer sections as well. While implementation of directive principles is required for improving the condition of the poor, fundamental rights are universal as they ensure dignity to every citizen and form the basis for equality among people.

  • Certain rights like right to constitutional remedy are important to secure protection for the poorest and weakest sections of the society from the arbitrary action of the state.

  • Enforcement of directive principles is important for ensuring social, economic and political justice. However, freedom of expression is still required to raise voice against any form of discrimination or injustice.

shaalaa.com
Relationship Between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles
  Is there an error in this question or solution?
Chapter 2: Rights in the Indian Constitution - Exercises [Page 50]

APPEARS IN

NCERT Political Science - Indian Constitution at Work [English] Class 11
Chapter 2 Rights in the Indian Constitution
Exercises | Q 6 | Page 50
Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×