Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
An activist working among the poor says that the poor don’t need Fundamental Rights. What they need are Directive Principles to be made legally binding. Do you agree with this? Give your reasons
Solution
Any answer supported with argument or explanation would solve the purpose. It is strongly recommended that you prepare the solution on your own. However, one sample solution has been provided for your reference:
-
No, I do not agree with this statement. Fundamental Rights cannot be denied to any section of the society and this is applicable to the poorer sections as well. While implementation of directive principles is required for improving the condition of the poor, fundamental rights are universal as they ensure dignity to every citizen and form the basis for equality among people.
-
Certain rights like right to constitutional remedy are important to secure protection for the poorest and weakest sections of the society from the arbitrary action of the state.
-
Enforcement of directive principles is important for ensuring social, economic and political justice. However, freedom of expression is still required to raise voice against any form of discrimination or injustice.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Explore the relationship between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles.
The Right to Education (Article 21A) is an example of a Directive Principle that was granted the justiciable status of a Fundamental Right through an amendment to the Constitution of India.
Explore any four differences between the Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy in the Constitution of India.