Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Answer in 100-150 words
Were the ideas of the Upanishadic thinkers different from those of the fatalists and materialists ? Give reasons for your answers.
Solution
The ideas of the Upanishadic thinkers is not much different from those of the fatalists and materialists. This is brought out by the following arguments.
(i) The essence of the philosophy of Jainism was already in existence in India, even before the birth of Lord Mahavir and Vardhaman.
(ii)Ahimsa or non-violence is the most important principle of Jainism. But this also form the basic thought of Hindu religion. Thus, there is a lot of similarity between the both the streams of the religion.
(iii)Upanishada believes and teaches Karma Theory. It means men and women should act and not worry about getting rewards. Fatalists also believed in the idea of work without thinking of the consequences. Thus there is a lot of similarity between the two.
(iv)Both fatalists and materislists believe that human beings are made , of four elements, earth, water, sky, air and fire.
Thus, we are inclined to agree that the idea of the Upanishad thinkers Eire not much different from that of the fatalists and materialists.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
What is the meaning of ‘Three baskets’?
Which of the following statements is incorrect regarding the lively discussions and debates in the Buddhist texts?
The compilation of Vinaya Pitaka, the Sutta Pitaka and the Abhidhamma Pitaka are called as ______.
During the mid-first millenium BC, the religious philosophy of Zarathustra prevailed in ______.
Rig Veda was compiled between ______.
The Buddha used to give teachings through:
Thinkers like Socrates and Plato belonged to which of the following countries?
Which of the following deities was mentioned in Rigveda?
Which of the following is correctly matched?