Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Explain the statement of Law of dominance is not universal.
Solution
- According to the law of dominance, when two homozygous individuals with one or more sets of contrasting characters are crossed, the alleles (characters) that appear in F1 are dominant and those which do not appear in F1 are recessive.
- In many cases, the dominance is not complete or absent. This can be explained by two deviations of Mendel’s law of dominance: Incomplete dominance and codominance. Thus, the law of dominance is significant and true, but it is not universally applicable.
RELATED QUESTIONS
___________ is the scientific name of garden pea, which Mendel used for his experiments.
Choose the correct answer:
Mendel conducted his hybridization experiments on _______
Choose the correct answer:
If any of Mendel's characters were linked; one would have been unable to derive.
Choose the correct answer:
The contrasting characters used by Mendel are called _____
Choose the correct answer:
If a pea plant with round seeds is selfed and the offspring are in the ratio 3:1, then the plant is _________
Give an account of incomplete dominance with a suitable example.
Who is regarded as the father of genetics?
Independent inheritance of two separate traits, shape and colour of seeds in Mendel’s cross on pea plants resulted in a observable ratio of ______.
Test Cross is a cross between:
Identify the incorrect statement with reference to the gene ‘I’ that controls ABO blood groups.