Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
While we condemn the crime, we are sympathetic to the criminal. Is this the reason why prison staff often develops a soft corner for those in custody?
Solution
‘Crime’ and ‘criminals’ are usually considered synonymous. However, our perception changes when we see a criminal suffering or serving his punishment. This is what happens with the prison staff. Noticing a criminal suffer in the prison, they unwittingly develop a soft corner for him in their hearts. They look at him as a human being and not as a mere criminal. They start noticing and appreciating their mental capabilities rather than just remembering their crime.
In the story, Jackson lets Evans keep his hat after knowing that he considered it to be his lucky charm. Evans knew of the emotional side of Jackson and so hit it directly through his talk about “lucky charm”, and managed to fool the stern and practical officer. Even the Governor could not help noticing his intelligence when he caught him in the hotel. Thus, he was not cruel or stern with Evans, and regrettably, took him leniently.
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
Describe the precautions taken by the prison officers to prevent Evans from escaping.
Why did McLeery bring a smallish semi-inflated rubber ring to Oxford Prison ?
Should criminals in the prison be given the opportunity of learning and education?
What kind of a person was Evans?
What were the precautions taken for the smooth conduct of the examination?
Did the Governor and his staff finally heave a sigh of relief?
Will the injured McLeery be able to help the prison officers track Evans?
Will the clues left behind on the question paper, put Evans back in prison again?
Where did Evans go?
Reflecting on the story, what did you feel about Evans’ having the last laugh?
When Stephens comes back to the cell he jumps to a conclusion and the whole machinery blindly goes by his assumption without even checking the identity of the injured ‘McLeery’. Does this show how hasty conjectures can prevent one from seeing the obvious? How is the criminal able to predict such negligence?
What could the Governor have done to securely bring back Evans to the prison when he caught him at the Golden Lion? Does that final act of foolishness really prove that “he was just another good-for-a-giggle, gullible governor, that was all”?
Do you agree that between crime and punishment it is mainly a battle of wits?
Colin Dexter, the author of Evans Tries an O-level employs the red herring technique of intentionally misleading readers by placing false clues to keep the plot enigmatic. Substantiate with reference to the text, in about 120-150 words.
How did Evans manage to smear himself with blood? What effect did it have on the officers?
Who do you think, has the last laugh-The Governor or Evans? Justify.
Give an account of the blunders committed by the prison authorities in the story 'Evan's Tries an O' level'.
Write a character sketch of Evans.
