Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Why did some members of Constituent Assembly argue for a strong Centre? Explain.
Explain
Solution
Balkrishna Sharma, Gopalaswamy Ayyangar, B.R. Ambedkar, and Jawaharlal Nehru were the principal advocates for a strong center. Given the bloodshed that followed partition, it is necessary to understand the constituent assembly's pronounced bias in favor of a strong center and the Union's rights over those of the States.
Arguments in support:
- J.L. Nehru - The ability to successfully speak for the entire nation in the international arena is necessary to maintain peace and coordinate crucial communication issues.
- B.R. Ambedkar - To quell the communal frenzy, the center's powers had to be considerably reinforced.
- Balkrishna Sharma - Only a powerful center can mobilize resources, set up appropriate administration, and prepare for the nation's well-being. Protect the nation from outside threats.
- Three lists the union, concurrent, and state lists were used to split the legislative authority between the federal government and the states.
- Only the central government could enact laws on the 97 topics of national concern on the union list.
- The state list covers 66 topics on which the state may enact legislation.
- Only forty-seven issues were on the current lists that the state and the federal government may enact laws on.
- On the governor's recommendation, Article 356 granted the center the authority to assume control of a state administration.
shaalaa.com
Is there an error in this question or solution?