Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Using the algebra of statement, prove that
[p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [~ r ∧ ~ q ∧ p] ≡ p
उत्तर
L.H.S.
= [p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [~ r ∧ ~ q ∧ p]
≡ [p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [(~ r ∧ ~ q)∧ p] ...[Associative Law]
≡ [p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [(~q ∧ ~r) ∧ p] ....[Commutative Law]
≡ [p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [~ (q ∨ r) ∧ p] ....[De Morgan’s Law]
≡ [p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ∨ [p ∧ ~(q ∨ r)] .....[Commutative Law]
≡ p ∧ [(q ∨ r) ∨ ~(q ∨ r)] ....[Distributive Law]
≡ p ∧ t ......[Complement Law]
≡ p .....[Identity Law]
= R.H.S.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
The negation of p ∧ (q → r) is ______________.
Without using truth tabic show that ~(p v q)v(~p ∧ q) = ~p
Without using the truth table show that P ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q)
If A = {2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, then which of the following is not true?
(A) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 3 = 8
(B) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 5
(C) ∃ x ∈ A such that x + 2 < 9
(D) ∀ x ∈ A such that x + 6 ≥ 9
Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.
If a man is a judge then he is honest.
Rewrite the following statement without using if ...... then.
It 2 is a rational number then `sqrt2` is irrational number.
Without using truth table prove that:
(p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ∼ q) ≡ p
Without using truth table prove that:
(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ∼ q) ≡ p ∨ q
Without using truth table prove that:
∼ [(p ∨ ∼ q) → (p ∧ ∼ q)] ≡ (p ∨ ∼ q) ∧ (∼ p ∨ q)
Using rules in logic, prove the following:
p ↔ q ≡ ∼(p ∧ ∼q) ∧ ∼(q ∧ ∼p)
Using rules in logic, prove the following:
∼p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p
Using rules in logic, prove the following:
∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ≡ ∼p
Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:
(p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ ∼r)
Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:
p ∧ (q ∨ r)
Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:
(p → q) ∧ r
Using the rules in logic, write the negation of the following:
(∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ∼q)
Let p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r). Then, this law is known as ______.
Without using truth table, show that
p ↔ q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)
Without using truth table, show that
p ∧ [(~ p ∨ q) ∨ ~ q] ≡ p
Without using truth table, show that
~ [(p ∧ q) → ~ q] ≡ p ∧ q
Without using truth table, show that
~r → ~ (p ∧ q) ≡ [~ (q → r)] → ~ p
Using the algebra of statement, prove that
(p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ ~ q) ≡ (p ∨ ~ q)
Using the algebra of statement, prove that
(p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q) ≡ (p ∨ ~ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ q)
The logically equivalent statement of (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r) is ______
The statement pattern p ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is ______.
The statement pattern [∼r ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q)] is equivalent to ______
(p ∧ ∼q) ∧ (∼p ∧ q) is a ______.
Which of the following is not a statement?
Without using truth table, prove that : [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] →q is a tautology.
The simplified form of [(~ p v q) ∧ r] v [(p ∧ ~ q) ∧ r] is ______.
Without using truth table prove that
[(p ∧ q ∧ ∼ p) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ q ∧ r) ∨ (p ∧ ∼ q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ r
The statement p → (q → p) is equivalent to ______.
