Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
The government has banned the use of animals in the laboratories for the purpose of dissection. Write a debate in 150 – 200 words either for or against this decision.
Solution
Good morning everyone. Today I am going express my views against the motion for banning the use of animals for dissection.
Dissection of animals in the school laboratories provide a practical experience for the theoretical knowledge that students gain from books. They procure an opportunity to actually put their learning into practice. It should not be looked at as a wrongful practice because such an activity is meant to develop the students’ knowledge of the elements and functions of the living being. The dissection of animals has a scientific purpose; it is a mode of hands-on education for students such that they learn outside of the pages of the textbook and actually look at what they are being taught. We should give more credit to the sensitivity and intelligence of our students so as not to believe that a dissection class will make them more prone to animal violence. Students should be taught the value of animal life by making them understand how an animal has the same kind of organs as human beings that perform similar functions. The governing philosophy behind teaching students to dissect animals should be that life, whether human or animal, is the same; each living being is tied to each other by their inner similarity. Thus, a ban on dissection of animals in school laboratories would not be the best course of action in such a case. I hope my views on this topic were substantial enough to throw a light on this topic.
Thank you.
RELATED QUESTIONS
"Academic excellence is the only requirement for a successful career." Write a debate either for or against the motion. (120 – 150 words)
'Private cars should be banned in the congested commercial areas of the cities.' Write a debate in 150-200 words either for or against the motion.
"A career counsellor (not you, yourself) is the best person to guide you in the choice of career." Write a debate in 150-200 words either for or against the motion.
'The policy of reservation of seats for admission to the professional courses is good for the deprived sections of society.'
Write a debate in 150-200 words either for or against the motion.
'Old age homes are not required in India.' Write a debate in 150-200 words either for or against the motion.
'Rising prices can be controlled only by the government.'
Write a debate in 150-200 words either for or against the motion.
'The policy of no detention till class VIII is not in the interest of students.' Write a debate in 150-200 words either in favour of or against the motion.
'Reality TV draws a factual picture of life.' Write a debate either for a against the motion in 150-200 words.
Some people feel that electronic media (TV news) will bring about the end of print media (newspapers). What are your views on the issue? Write a debate in 150 – 200 words either for or against this view.
Consumerism is increasing day by day. Luxuries of yesterday have become necessities of today. The result is that the more we want the more miserable we become. Write a debate in 150 − 200 words on 'The only way to minimise human suffering and pain is to control our needs.' You are Navtej/Navita.
Migration from villages to cities has led to the spread of urban slums. People living in these slums lead a miserable life. Economic disparity leads to the problems of law and order. Write a debate in 150 − 200 words on 'Solution to the problem of misery in the urban slums lies in creating jobs in the villages'. You are Navtej/Navita.
More industrial production means availability of more goods. better life style, lower prices, more jobs, etc. However, a higher standard of living can be achieved only at a cost − depletion of raw materials and air and water pollution. Write a debate in 150 − 200 words either for or against the motion − 'Standard of living can be raised, but only at a great cost'. You are Navtej/Navita.
