Advertisements
Advertisements
Question
Consider the following sets of quantum numbers:
| n | l | m | s | |
| (i) | 3 | 0 | 0 | `+1/2` |
| (ii) | 2 | 2 | 1 | `-1/2` |
| (iii) | 4 | 3 | –2 | `+1/2` |
| (iv) | 1 | 0 | –1 | `+1/2` |
| (v) | 3 | 4 | 3 | `-1/2` |
Which of the following sets of quantum number is not possible?
Options
(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv)
(ii), (iv) and (v)
(i) and (iii)
(ii), (iii) and (iv)
Solution
(ii), (iv) and (v)
APPEARS IN
RELATED QUESTIONS
The energies E1 and E2 of the two radiations are 25 eV and 50 eV respectively. The relation between their wavelengths ie λ1 and λ2 will be
Based on equation E = `-2.178 xx 10^(-18) "J" ("z"^2/"n"^2)`, certain conclusions are written. Which of them is not correct?
Which of the following pairs of d-orbitals will have electron density along the axes?
Assertion: Number of radial and angular nodes for 3p orbital are 1, 1 respectively.
Reason: Number of radial and angular nodes depends only on principal quantum number.
What is the maximum numbers of electrons that can be associated with the following set of quantum numbers?
n = 3, l = 1 and m = –1
The total number of orbitals associated with the principal quantum number n = 3 is
Which quantum number reveal information about the shape, energy, orientation and size of orbitals?
How many orbitals are possible for n = 4?
The stabilisation of a half-filled d-orbital is more pronounced than that of the p-orbital why?
Protons can be accelerated in particle accelerators. Calculate the wavelength (in Å) of such accelerated proton moving at 2.85 × 108 ms−1 (the mass of proton is 1.673 × 10−27 Kg).
