मराठी
महाराष्ट्र राज्य शिक्षण मंडळएचएससी वाणिज्य (इंग्रजी माध्यम) इयत्ता १२ वी

Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement. If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper. - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.

बेरीज

उत्तर

Let p : I do not work hard.
q : I do not prosper.

∴ The given statement is p → q.

Its converse is q → p.
If I do not prosper then I do not work hard.

Its inverse is ~p → ~q.
If I work hard then I prosper.

Its contrapositive is ~q → ~p.
If I prosper then I work hard.

shaalaa.com
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
पाठ 1: Mathematical Logic - Miscellaneous Exercise 1 [पृष्ठ ३३]

APPEARS IN

बालभारती Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] 12 Standard HSC Maharashtra State Board
पाठ 1 Mathematical Logic
Miscellaneous Exercise 1 | Q 4.15 | पृष्ठ ३३

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧  ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )


Show that the following statement pattern in contingency : 

(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)] 


Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]


(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________.


Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p ∧ q) → q


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)


Write the dual of the following:

~(p ∨ q) ∧ [p ∨ ~ (q ∧ ~ r)]


Write the dual of the following:

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

Karina is very good or everybody likes her.


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.


Write the negation of the following statement.

All the stars are shining if it is night.


Write the negation of the following statement.

∀ n ∈ N, n + 1 > 0


Write the negation of the following statement.

∃ n ∈ N, (n2 + 2) is odd number.


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

(p → r) ∧ q


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p → q) ∧ r


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(~p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(~p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∨ (~q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∨ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

(p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ~(p ∧ q)


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.


Write the dual of the following.

(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


Write the dual of the following.

(p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)


Write the dual of the following.

~(p ∨ q) ≡ ~p ∧ ~q


The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______


Write the dual of the following.

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country


Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.


Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?


Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×