Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∨ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
उत्तर
| p | q | ~p | ~q | p∨q | ~(p∨q) | ~(p∨q)→p | (~p)∧(~q) | [~(p∨q)→p]↔[(~p)∧(~q)] |
| T | T | F | F | T | F | T | F | F |
| T | F | F | T | T | F | T | F | F |
| F | T | T | F | T | F | T | F | F |
| F | F | T | T | F | T | F | T | F |
All the truth values in the last column are F. Hence, it is a contradiction.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent :
(p ∨ q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
If p : It is raining
q : It is humid
Write the following statements in symbolic form:
(a) It is raining or humid.
(b) If it is raining then it is humid.
(c) It is raining but not humid.
Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]
By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency. (p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q ).
Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)
Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
p → (~ p ∨ q)
Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r
(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.
Write the negation of the following statement.
All the stars are shining if it is night.
Write the negation of the following statement.
Some continuous functions are differentiable.
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p → q) ∨ (p → r)
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(~p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
(p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ~(p ∧ q)
Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.
“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”
The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______
Write the dual of the following.
13 is prime number and India is a democratic country
Complete the truth table.
| p | q | r | q → r | r → p | (q → r) ˅ (r → p) |
| T | T | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | T | F | F | `square` | `square` |
| T | F | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | F | F | T | `square` | `square` |
| F | T | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | T | F | `square` | T | `square` |
| F | F | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | F | F | `square` | T | `square` |
The given statement pattern is a `square`
Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.
Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?
Write the negation of the following statement:
(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:
(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)
If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].
