मराठी
महाराष्ट्र राज्य शिक्षण मंडळएचएससी वाणिज्य (इंग्रजी माध्यम) इयत्ता १२ वी

Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern. p → (~ p ∨ q) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

p → (~ p ∨ q)

बेरीज

उत्तर

p → (~ p ∨ q)

p q ~p ~ p ∨ q p → (~ p ∨ q)
T T F T T
T F F F F
F T T T T
F F T T T
shaalaa.com
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
पाठ 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.6 [पृष्ठ १६]

APPEARS IN

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p→q) ∧ q]→p


Show that the following statement pattern in contingency : 

(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)] 


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
√-4 is a rational number.


Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."


By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency.  (p →  q) ∧  (p ∧ ~ q ).


Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p ∧ q) → q


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q)


Fill in the blanks :

Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.


Using the truth table, verify

p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)


Write the dual of the following:

(p ∨ q) ∨ r


Write the dual of the following:

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country.


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.


Write the negation of the following statement.

All the stars are shining if it is night.


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

~(p ∨ q) → r


Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.

"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p → q) ∧ r


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(~p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∨ (~q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∨ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]


Write the dual of the following.

(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


Write the dual of the following.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ r)


The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______


Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.


The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.


If p → q is true and p ∧ q is false, then the truth value of ∼p ∨ q is ______


In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .

  1. `bar(PR)`  
  2. `bar(PM)`
  3. `bar(QM)`

Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×