मराठी
महाराष्ट्र राज्य शिक्षण मंडळएचएससी वाणिज्य (इंग्रजी माध्यम) इयत्ता १२ वी

Write the dual of the following. (~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Write the dual of the following.

(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)

एका वाक्यात उत्तर

उत्तर

(~p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ ~q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)

shaalaa.com
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
पाठ 1: Mathematical Logic - Miscellaneous Exercise 1 [पृष्ठ ३३]

APPEARS IN

बालभारती Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] 12 Standard HSC Maharashtra State Board
पाठ 1 Mathematical Logic
Miscellaneous Exercise 1 | Q 4.18 | पृष्ठ ३३

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -
“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”


Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )


Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]


Write the negation of the following statement : 
If the lines are parallel then their slopes are equal.


Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

~ p → (p → ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


If p is any statement then (p ∨ ∼p) is a ______.


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country.


Write the negation of the following statement.

All the stars are shining if it is night.


Write the negation of the following statement.

∀ n ∈ N, n + 1 > 0


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)


What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∨ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.


Write the dual of the following.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ r)


Write the dual of the following

(p ˄ ∼q) ˅ (∼p ˄ q) ≡ (p ˅ q) ˄ ∼(p ˄ q)


The statement pattern (p ∧ q) ∧ [~ r v (p ∧ q)] v (~ p ∧ q) is equivalent to ______. 


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)


The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.


If p → q is true and p ∧ q is false, then the truth value of ∼p ∨ q is ______


In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .

  1. `bar(PR)`  
  2. `bar(PM)`
  3. `bar(QM)`

Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×