Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
~ p → (p → ~ q)
उत्तर
| p | q | ~p | ~q | p→~q | ~p→(p→~q) |
| T | T | F | F | F | T |
| T | F | F | T | T | T |
| F | T | T | F | T | T |
| F | F | T | T | T | T |
All the truth values in the last column are T. Hence, it is tautology.
संबंधित प्रश्न
Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p→q) ∧ q]→p
Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`
Write converse and inverse of the following statement:
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.”
If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧ ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )
Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]
Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."
Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement:
x2 ≥ 1
State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
√-4 is a rational number.
By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency. (p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q ).
Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]
Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p → q) ∨ (q → p)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
p → (~ p ∨ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)
If p is any statement then (p ∨ ∼p) is a ______.
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]
Using the truth table, verify
~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q
Write the negation of the following statement.
All the stars are shining if it is night.
Write the negation of the following statement.
Some continuous functions are differentiable.
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
(p → r) ∧ q
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
~(p ∨ q) → r
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p → q) ∨ (p → r)
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)
What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.
The false statement in the following is ______.
Choose the correct alternative:
If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its
The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______
Complete the truth table.
| p | q | r | q → r | r → p | (q → r) ˅ (r → p) |
| T | T | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | T | F | F | `square` | `square` |
| T | F | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | F | F | T | `square` | `square` |
| F | T | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | T | F | `square` | T | `square` |
| F | F | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | F | F | `square` | T | `square` |
The given statement pattern is a `square`
Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:
(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)
The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.
Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.
