Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.
उत्तर
(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q)
| A | B | |||||
| p | q | ∼p | ∼q | p ∧ q | ∼p ∨ ∼q | A ∨ B |
| T | T | F | F | T | F | T |
| T | F | F | T | F | T | T |
| F | T | T | F | F | T | T |
| F | F | T | T | F | T | T |
From the last coloumn
(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -
“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”
Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T
Write converse and inverse of the following statement:
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.”
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
∼ (∼ q ∧ p) ∧ q
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p → q) ∨ (q → p)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
p → (~ p ∨ q)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
Fill in the blanks :
Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Using the truth table, verify.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
Using the truth table, verify
~(p → ~q) ≡ p ∧ ~ (~ q) ≡ p ∧ q
Using the truth table, verify
~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p
Write the dual of the following:
~(p ∨ q) ∧ [p ∨ ~ (q ∧ ~ r)]
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Karina is very good or everybody likes her.
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
(p → r) ∧ q
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.
Write the dual of the following.
(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)
Write the dual of the following.
(p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)
Examine whether the statement pattern
[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.
Complete the truth table.
| p | q | r | q → r | r → p | (q → r) ˅ (r → p) |
| T | T | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | T | F | F | `square` | `square` |
| T | F | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | F | F | T | `square` | `square` |
| F | T | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | T | F | `square` | T | `square` |
| F | F | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | F | F | `square` | T | `square` |
The given statement pattern is a `square`
If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively
Using truth table verify that:
(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q
Write the negation of the following statement:
(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)
Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:
(p→q)∧(p→r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)
