Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p → q) ∨ (q → p)
उत्तर
| p | q | p → q | q → p | (p → q) ∨ (q → p) |
| T | T | T | T | T |
| T | F | F | T | T |
| F | T | T | F | T |
| F | F | T | T | T |
All the entries in the last column of the above truth table are T.
∴ (p → q) ∨ (q → p) is a tautology.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Write the dual of the following statements:
Madhuri has curly hair and brown eyes.
Write converse and inverse of the following statement:
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.”
Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]
Show that the following statement pattern in contingency :
(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)]
Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement:
x2 ≥ 1
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
∼ (∼ q ∧ p) ∧ q
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]
(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________.
Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
p → (~ p ∨ q)
Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r
(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
~ p → (p → ~ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Using the truth table, verify
p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)
Using the truth table, verify
~(p → ~q) ≡ p ∧ ~ (~ q) ≡ p ∧ q
Using the truth table, verify
~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.
Write the negation of the following statement.
∃ n ∈ N, (n2 + 2) is odd number.
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p → q) ∧ r
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(~p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.
Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.
“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”
Choose the correct alternative:
If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a
Write the dual of the following.
13 is prime number and India is a democratic country
Examine whether the statement pattern
[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.
The statement pattern (p ∧ q) ∧ [~ r v (p ∧ q)] v (~ p ∧ q) is equivalent to ______.
Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.
Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)
Write the negation of the following statement:
(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)
Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:
(p→q)∧(p→r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:
(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)
If p → q is true and p ∧ q is false, then the truth value of ∼p ∨ q is ______
The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.
In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .
- `bar(PR)`
- `bar(PM)`
- `bar(QM)`
If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].
