Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q
उत्तर
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| p | q | ~p | ~q | p∧q | ~(p∧q) | ~p∨~q |
| T | T | F | F | T | F | F |
| T | F | F | T | F | T | T |
| F | T | T | F | F | T | T |
| F | F | T | T | F | T | T |
In the above table, entries in columns 6 and 7 are identical.
∴ Statement ~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q are equivalent.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]
Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Write the negation of the following statement :
If the lines are parallel then their slopes are equal.
State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
√-4 is a rational number.
By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency. (p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q ).
Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)
Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(p ∧ q) → q
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p
If p is any statement then (p ∨ ∼p) is a ______.
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]
Using the truth table, verify.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
Using the truth table, verify
~(p → ~q) ≡ p ∧ ~ (~ q) ≡ p ∧ q
Write the dual of the following:
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.
Write the negation of the following statement.
All the stars are shining if it is night.
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
~(p ∨ q) → r
Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.
"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.
Write the dual of the following.
(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)
Examine whether the statement pattern
[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.
Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:
(p→q)∧(p→r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:
(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)
If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].
