Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]
उत्तर
| p | q | ~p | ~q | p∧q | (p∧q)∨(~p) | p∧~q | [(p∧q)∨(~p)]∨[p∧(~q)] |
| T | T | F | F | T | T | F | T |
| T | F | F | T | F | F | T | T |
| F | T | T | F | F | T | F | T |
| F | F | T | T | F | T | F | T |
All the truth values in the last column are T. Hence, it is a tautology.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Write the negation of the following statement :
If the lines are parallel then their slopes are equal.
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
p → (~ p ∨ q)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]
Using the truth table, verify
~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q
Write the dual of the following:
(p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual of the following:
~(p ∨ q) ∧ [p ∨ ~ (q ∧ ~ r)]
Write the dual of the following:
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Karina is very good or everybody likes her.
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.
Write the negation of the following statement.
Some continuous functions are differentiable.
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
~(p ∨ q) → r
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
(~p ∧ q) ∧ (~q ∨ ~r)
Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.
"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p → q) ∧ r
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∨ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]
Write the dual of the following
(p ˄ ∼q) ˅ (∼p ˄ q) ≡ (p ˅ q) ˄ ∼(p ˄ q)
In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .
- `bar(PR)`
- `bar(PM)`
- `bar(QM)`
Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.
