मराठी
महाराष्ट्र राज्य शिक्षण मंडळएचएससी वाणिज्य (इंग्रजी माध्यम) इयत्ता १२ वी

Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction. (p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)

बेरीज

उत्तर

p q ~p ~q p∨q ~p∧~q (p∨q)∧(~p∧~q)
T T F F T F F
T F F T T F F
F T T F T F F
F F T T F T F

All the truth values in the last column are F. Hence, it is a contradiction.

shaalaa.com
  या प्रश्नात किंवा उत्तरात काही त्रुटी आहे का?
पाठ 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.6 [पृष्ठ १६]

APPEARS IN

संबंधित प्रश्‍न

Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.

"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3 "


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent :

(p ∨ q) →  r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`


Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T


Write the negation of the Following Statement :
∀ y ∈  N, y2 + 3 ≤ 7


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]


Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]


Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (~ p ∨ q)


Using the truth table, verify

~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q


Write the dual of the following:

~(p ∨ q) ∧ [p ∨ ~ (q ∧ ~ r)]


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country.


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

Karina is very good or everybody likes her.


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

(p → r) ∧ q


Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.

If he studies, then he will go to college.


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(~p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

(p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ~(p ∧ q)


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]


Choose the correct alternative:

If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a


Choose the correct alternative:

If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its


The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______


Complete the truth table.

p q r q → r r → p (q → r) ˅ (r → p)
T T T T `square` T
T T F F `square` `square`
T F T T `square` T
T F F T `square` `square`
F T T `square` F T
F T F `square` T `square`
F F T `square` F T
F F F `square` T `square`

The given statement pattern is a `square`


The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:

(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×