हिंदी

Examine Whether the Following Statement (P ∧ Q) ∨ (∼P ∨ ∼Q) is a Tautology Or Contradiction Or Neither of Them. - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.

योग

उत्तर

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q)

        A B  
p q ∼p ∼q p ∧ q ∼p ∨ ∼q A ∨  B
T T F F T F T
T F F T F T T
F T T F F T T
F F T T F T T

From the last coloumn 

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology

shaalaa.com
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
2013-2014 (October)

APPEARS IN

संबंधित प्रश्न

If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧  ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )


If   p : It is raining
     q : It is humid

Write the following statements in symbolic form:

(a) It is raining or humid.
(b) If it is raining then it is humid.
(c) It is raining but not humid. 


Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]


Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement
5x - 3 < 10


Write the negation of the Following Statement :
∀ y ∈  N, y2 + 3 ≤ 7


Write the negation of the following statement : 
If the lines are parallel then their slopes are equal.


By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency.  (p →  q) ∧  (p ∧ ~ q ).


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p


Fill in the blanks :

Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table, verify

~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)


Write the dual of the following:

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r


Write the negation of the following statement.

Some continuous functions are differentiable.


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

(p → r) ∧ q


Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.

If he studies, then he will go to college.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(~p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∨ (~q)


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.


Write the dual of the following.

~(p ∨ q) ≡ ~p ∧ ~q


Express the truth of the following statement by the Venn diagram.

Some members of the present Indian cricket are not committed.


Write the dual of the following

(p ˄ ∼q) ˅ (∼p ˄ q) ≡ (p ˅ q) ˄ ∼(p ˄ q)


Examine whether the statement pattern

[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.


If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively


The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.


Using truth table verify that:

(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q


Write the negation of the following statement:

(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)


The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×