हिंदी

Prove that the following pair of statement patterns is equivalent. p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)

योग

उत्तर

1 2 3 4 5 6
p q p↔q p→q q→p (p→q)∧(q→p)
T T T T T T
T F F F T F
F T F T F F
F F T T T T

In the above table, entries in columns 3 and 6 are identical.

∴ Statement p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p) are equivalent.

shaalaa.com
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
अध्याय 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.6 [पृष्ठ १६]

APPEARS IN

बालभारती Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] 12 Standard HSC Maharashtra State Board
अध्याय 1 Mathematical Logic
Exercise 1.6 | Q 7.2 | पृष्ठ १६

संबंधित प्रश्न

Write the dual of the following statements:

Madhuri has curly hair and brown eyes.


Write converse and inverse of the following statement: 
“If a man is a bachelor then he is unhappy.” 


If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧  ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )


If   p : It is raining
     q : It is humid

Write the following statements in symbolic form:

(a) It is raining or humid.
(b) If it is raining then it is humid.
(c) It is raining but not humid. 


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Write the negation of the following statement : 
If the lines are parallel then their slopes are equal.


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p → q) ∨ (q → p)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table, verify

~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q


Write the negation of the following statement.

∃ n ∈ N, (n2 + 2) is odd number.


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[(~p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∨ (~q)


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q


Write the dual of the following.

(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)


Write the dual of the following.

(p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)


Write the dual of the following.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ r)


Express the truth of the following statement by the Venn diagram.

Some members of the present Indian cricket are not committed.


Write the dual of the following

(p ˄ ∼q) ˅ (∼p ˄ q) ≡ (p ˅ q) ˄ ∼(p ˄ q)


Choose the correct alternative:

If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its


If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively


Write the negation of the following statement:

(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×