Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)
विकल्प
Tautology
Contradiction
Contingency
उत्तर
| p | q | p ∧ q | q ∨ p | (p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p) |
| T | T | T | T | T |
| T | F | F | T | T |
| F | T | F | T | T |
| F | F | F | F | T |
All the entries in the last column of the above truth table are T.
∴ (p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p) is a Tautology.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p→q) ∧ q]→p
Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3 "
Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T
If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧ ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )
Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]
Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."
Show that the following statement pattern in contingency :
(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)]
Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement
5x - 3 < 10
Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement:
x2 ≥ 1
State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
√-4 is a rational number.
Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."
By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency. (p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q ).
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)
(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________.
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
(~ p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q)
Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r
(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
~ p → (p → ~ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(p ∧ q) → q
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p
If p is any statement then (p ∨ ∼p) is a ______.
Fill in the blanks :
Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p∧~q) → (~p∧~q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Karina is very good or everybody likes her.
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.
Write the negation of the following statement.
Some continuous functions are differentiable.
Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.
If he studies, then he will go to college.
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)
What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
(p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ~(p ∧ q)
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.
Express the truth of the following statement by the Venn diagram.
Some members of the present Indian cricket are not committed.
Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.
“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”
Choose the correct alternative:
If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its
Examine whether the statement pattern
[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.
Complete the truth table.
| p | q | r | q → r | r → p | (q → r) ˅ (r → p) |
| T | T | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | T | F | F | `square` | `square` |
| T | F | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | F | F | T | `square` | `square` |
| F | T | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | T | F | `square` | T | `square` |
| F | F | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | F | F | `square` | T | `square` |
The given statement pattern is a `square`
Using truth table verify that:
(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q
The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.
Write the negation of the following statement:
(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)
Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:
(p→q)∧(p→r)
Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.
