Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]
उत्तर
Truth Table
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) |
| p | q | p ∧ q | ∼(p ∧ q) | p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)] |
| T | T | T | F | T |
| T | F | F | T | T |
| F | T | F | T | T |
| F | F | F | T | T |
All entries in coloumn (5) are T's
p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)] is Tautology.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p→q) ∧ q]→p
Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent :
(p ∨ q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."
Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement
5x - 3 < 10
Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
∼ (∼ q ∧ p) ∧ q
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p → q) ∨ (q → p)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
p → (~ p ∨ q)
Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r
(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)
Write the dual of the following:
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
13 is prime number and India is a democratic country.
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Karina is very good or everybody likes her.
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.
Write the negation of the following statement.
Some continuous functions are differentiable.
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
(~p ∧ q) ∧ (~q ∨ ~r)
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p → q) ∨ (p → r)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∨ r) → ~(q ∧ r)
What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.
Examine whether the statement pattern
[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.
Complete the truth table.
| p | q | r | q → r | r → p | (q → r) ˅ (r → p) |
| T | T | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | T | F | F | `square` | `square` |
| T | F | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | F | F | T | `square` | `square` |
| F | T | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | T | F | `square` | T | `square` |
| F | F | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | F | F | `square` | T | `square` |
The given statement pattern is a `square`
Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.
Write the negation of the following statement:
(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)
Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:
(p→q)∧(p→r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:
(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)
