Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q
उत्तर
| p | q | ∼ p | ∼ q | p ∨ q | (p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p | [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q |
| T | T | F | F | T | F | F |
| T | F | F | T | T | F | F |
| F | T | T | F | T | T | F |
| F | F | T | T | F | F | F |
All the entries in the last column of the above truth table are F.
∴ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q is a contradiction.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`
Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T
If p and q are true statements and r and s are false statements, find the truth value of the following :
( p ∧ ∼ r ) ∧ ( ∼ q ∧ s )
Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]
Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."
Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."
Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)
Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)
Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∧ (p → q)] → q
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p → q) ∨ (q → p)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
p → (~ p ∨ q)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
(~ p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q)
Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r
(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
q ∨ [~ (p ∧ q)]
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
~ p → (p → ~ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ (~p ∨ ~q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
p ∧ [(p → ~ q) → q]
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Using the truth table, verify.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q
Write the dual of the following:
(p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual of the following:
~(p ∨ q) ∧ [p ∨ ~ (q ∧ ~ r)]
Write the dual of the following:
~(p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p ∨ ~ q
Write the negation of the following statement.
∀ n ∈ N, n + 1 > 0
Write the negation of the following statement.
Some continuous functions are differentiable.
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.
Write the dual of the following.
(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)
Write the dual of the following.
(p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)
Write the dual of the following.
~(p ∨ q) ≡ ~p ∧ ~q
Express the truth of the following statement by the Venn diagram.
Some members of the present Indian cricket are not committed.
Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.
“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”
Choose the correct alternative:
If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a
Choose the correct alternative:
If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its
The contrapositive of p → ~ q is ______
Complete the truth table.
| p | q | r | q → r | r → p | (q → r) ˅ (r → p) |
| T | T | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | T | F | F | `square` | `square` |
| T | F | T | T | `square` | T |
| T | F | F | T | `square` | `square` |
| F | T | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | T | F | `square` | T | `square` |
| F | F | T | `square` | F | T |
| F | F | F | `square` | T | `square` |
The given statement pattern is a `square`
Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?
The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.
Write the negation of the following statement:
(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)
Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:
(p→q)∧(p→r)
If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].
