हिंदी

Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement. If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20. - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.

योग

उत्तर

Let p : 2 + 5 = 10
q : 4 + 10 = 20

∴ The given statement is p → q.

Its converse is q → p.
If 4 + 10 = 20, then 2 + 5 = 10

Its inverse is ~p → ~q.
If 2 + 5 ≠ 10 then 4 + 10 ≠ 20.

Its contrapositive is ~q → ~p.
If 4 + 10 ≠ 20 then 2 + 5 ≠ 10.

shaalaa.com
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
अध्याय 1: Mathematical Logic - Miscellaneous Exercise 1 [पृष्ठ ३३]

APPEARS IN

बालभारती Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] 12 Standard HSC Maharashtra State Board
अध्याय 1 Mathematical Logic
Miscellaneous Exercise 1 | Q 4.15 | पृष्ठ ३३

संबंधित प्रश्न

Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -
“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”


Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.

"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3 "


Write the dual of the following statements:

Madhuri has curly hair and brown eyes.


If   p : It is raining
     q : It is humid

Write the following statements in symbolic form:

(a) It is raining or humid.
(b) If it is raining then it is humid.
(c) It is raining but not humid. 


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
Every quadratic equation has only real roots.


State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
√-4 is a rational number.


Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p → q) ∨ (q → p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

~ p → (p → ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (~ p ∨ q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table, verify.

p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

Karina is very good or everybody likes her.


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

(p → r) ∧ q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∨ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (~p ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ q


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]


Write the dual of the following.

~(p ∨ q) ≡ ~p ∧ ~q


Examine whether the statement pattern

[p → (~ q ˅ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] is a tautology, contradiction or contingency.


If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively


Write the negation of the following statement:

(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)


If p → q is true and p ∧ q is false, then the truth value of ∼p ∨ q is ______


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×