हिंदी

Show that the following statement pattern is contingency. (p → q) ↔ (~ p ∨ q) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (~ p ∨ q)

योग

उत्तर

p q ~p p→q ~p∨q (p→q)↔(~p∨q)
T T F T T T
T F F F F T
F T T T T T
F F T T T T

All the truth values in the last column are T. Hence, it is a tautology. Not contingency.

shaalaa.com
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
अध्याय 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.6 [पृष्ठ १६]

APPEARS IN

बालभारती Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] 12 Standard HSC Maharashtra State Board
अध्याय 1 Mathematical Logic
Exercise 1.6 | Q 5.2 | पृष्ठ १६

संबंधित प्रश्न

Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."


Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)


Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)


(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________.


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:

(p → q) ∨ (q → p)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p ∧ q) → q


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)


Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.

(p → q) ∧ (p → r)


Using the truth table, verify

~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p


Write the dual of the following:

(p ∨ q) ∨ r


Write the dual of the following:

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r


Write the dual of the following:

~(p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p ∨ ~ q


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.


Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.

A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

(p → r) ∧ q


Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.

If he studies, then he will go to college.


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p → q) ∨ (p → r)


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p → q) ∧ r


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ r) → ~(q ∧ r)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.

[~(p ∨ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)


Write the dual of the following.

(p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)


The false statement in the following is ______.


Complete the truth table.

p q r q → r r → p (q → r) ˅ (r → p)
T T T T `square` T
T T F F `square` `square`
T F T T `square` T
T F F T `square` `square`
F T T `square` F T
F T F `square` T `square`
F F T `square` F T
F F F `square` T `square`

The given statement pattern is a `square`


Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?


Using truth table verify that:

(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)


The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.


Write the negation of the following statement:

(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)


Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×