Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
उत्तर
| p | q | ~p | ~q | p∧q | ~(p∧q) | ~(p∧q)→p | (~p)∧(~q) | [~(p∧q)→p]↔[(~p)∧(~q)] |
| T | T | F | F | T | F | T | F | F |
| T | F | F | T | F | T | T | F | F |
| F | T | T | F | F | T | F | F | T |
| F | F | T | T | F | T | F | T | F |
Truth values in the last column are not identical. Hence, it is contingency.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`
Write the dual of the following statements: (p ∨ q) ∧ T
If p : It is raining
q : It is humid
Write the following statements in symbolic form:
(a) It is raining or humid.
(b) If it is raining then it is humid.
(c) It is raining but not humid.
Using truth table, examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency: p ∨ [∼(p ∧ q)]
Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement
5x - 3 < 10
State if the following sentence is a statement. In case of a statement, write down the truth value :
Every quadratic equation has only real roots.
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)
Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
p → (~ p ∨ q)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
(~ p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(p → q) ↔ (~ q → ~ p)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p∧~q) → (~p∧~q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p → q) ↔ (~ p ∨ q)
Using the truth table, verify
p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q
Write the dual of the following:
(p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual of the following:
~(p ∨ q) ∧ [p ∨ ~ (q ∧ ~ r)]
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Karina is very good or everybody likes her.
Write the negation of the following statement.
∀ n ∈ N, n + 1 > 0
Write the negation of the following statement.
∃ n ∈ N, (n2 + 2) is odd number.
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
~p ∧ q ≡ [(p ∨ q)] ∧ ~p
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.
Write the dual of the following.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ r)
Choose the correct alternative:
If p is any statement, then (p ˅ ~p) is a
The statement pattern (∼ p ∧ q) is logically equivalent to ______.
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:
(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)
