हिंदी

Using the truth table, verify p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q) - Mathematics and Statistics

Advertisements
Advertisements

प्रश्न

Using the truth table, verify

p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)

योग

उत्तर

1 2 3 4 5 6
p q ~q p→q p→(p→q) ~q→(p→q)
T T F T T T
T F T F F F
F T F T T T
F F T T T T

In the above truth table, entries in columns 5 and 6 are identical.

∴ p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)

shaalaa.com
  क्या इस प्रश्न या उत्तर में कोई त्रुटि है?
अध्याय 1: Mathematical Logic - Exercise 1.6 [पृष्ठ १६]

APPEARS IN

बालभारती Mathematics and Statistics 1 (Commerce) [English] 12 Standard HSC Maharashtra State Board
अध्याय 1 Mathematical Logic
Exercise 1.6 | Q 6.2 | पृष्ठ १६

संबंधित प्रश्न

Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.

"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3 "


Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent :

(p ∨ q) →  r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."


By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency.  (p →  q) ∧  (p ∧ ~ q ).


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)


Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.

p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ∼ q)


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ∼ q) ↔ (p → q)


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q


Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.

p → (~ p ∨ q)


Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r

(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r


Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.

(p ∧ ~ q) → (~ p ∧ ~ q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)


Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.

(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)


If p is any statement then (p ∨ ∼p) is a ______.


Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.

(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q)


Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.

p → q and ~ q → ~ p and ~ p ∨ q


Write the dual of the following:

~(p ∨ q) ∧ [p ∨ ~ (q ∧ ~ r)]


Write the negation of the following statement.

Some continuous functions are differentiable.


Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:

~(p ∨ q) → r


Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.

"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"


With proper justification, state the negation of the following.

(p → q) ∨ (p → r)


Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.

(p ∨ r) → ~(q ∧ r)


What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.


Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.

p ↔ q ≡ ~(p ∧ ~q) ∧ ~(q ∧ ~p)


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.


Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.

If I do not work hard, then I do not prosper.


State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.

p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]


Write the dual of the following.

13 is prime number and India is a democratic country


The equivalent form of the statement ~(p → ~ q) is ______.


Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?


Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:

[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)


Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.


If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].


Share
Notifications

Englishहिंदीमराठी


      Forgot password?
Use app×