Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the following statement.
"If it snows, then they do not drive the car"
उत्तर
Let p: It snows.
q: They do not drive the car.
∴ The given statement is p → q.
Its converse is q → p.
If they do not drive the car, then it snows.
Its inverse is ~p → ~q.
If it does not snow, then they drive the car.
Its contrapositive is ~q → ~p.
If they drive the car, then it does not snow.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Examine whether the following logical statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p→q) ∧ q]→p
Write the converse and contrapositive of the statement -
“If two triangles are congruent, then their areas are equal.”
Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3 "
Using truth table examine whether the following statement pattern is tautology, contradiction or contingency `(p^^~q) harr (p->q)`
Write the dual of the following statements:
Madhuri has curly hair and brown eyes.
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )
If p : It is raining
q : It is humid
Write the following statements in symbolic form:
(a) It is raining or humid.
(b) If it is raining then it is humid.
(c) It is raining but not humid.
Express the following statement in symbolic form and write its truth value.
"If 4 is an odd number, then 6 is divisible by 3."
Show that the following statement pattern in contingency :
(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)]
Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement
5x - 3 < 10
Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement:
x2 ≥ 1
Prove that the following statement pattern is equivalent:
(p v q) → r and (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Write the negation of the Following Statement :
∀ y ∈ N, y2 + 3 ≤ 7
Write converse and inverse of the following statement :
"If Ravi is good in logic then Ravi is good in Mathematics."
By constructing the truth table, determine whether the following statement pattern ls a tautology , contradiction or . contingency. (p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q ).
Examine whether the following statement (p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∨ ∼q) is a tautology or contradiction or neither of them.
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (∼ p ∧ q) ≡ ∼ p
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ↔ q ≡ ∼ [(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼ (p ∧ q)]
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q → p) ≡ ∼ p → (p → q)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) (p → r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
[∼ (p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Using the truth table proves the following logical equivalence.
∼ (p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ∼ q) ∨ (q ∧ ∼ p)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
[(p → q) ∧ ∼ q] → ∼ p
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
∼ (∼ q ∧ p) ∧ q
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
[p → (∼ q ∨ r)] ↔ ∼ [p → (q → r)]
Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
[(p ∨ q) ∧ ∼p] ∧ ∼q
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ∼q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p → q) ∨ (q → p)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
p → (~ p ∨ q)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
(~ p ∨ q) ∧ (~ p ∨ ~ q)
Prepare truth tables for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~ q)
Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r
(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
~ p → (p → ~ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(p ∧ q) → q
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(~p ∧ ~q ) → (p → q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology.
(~ p ∨ ~ q) ↔ ~ (p ∧ q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p ∧ q) ∧ ~p
Prove that the following statement pattern is a contradiction.
(p → q) ∧ (p ∧ ~ q)
Fill in the blanks :
Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p∧~q) → (~p∧~q)
Using the truth table, verify.
p ∨ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)
Using the truth table, verify
p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)
Using the truth table, verify
~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q
Write the dual of the following:
(p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual of the following:
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual of the following:
~(p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p ∨ ~ q
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
13 is prime number and India is a democratic country.
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Karina is very good or everybody likes her.
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
Radha and Sushmita cannot read Urdu.
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.
Write the negation of the following statement.
All the stars are shining if it is night.
Write the negation of the following statement.
∃ n ∈ N, (n2 + 2) is odd number.
Write the negation of the following statement.
Some continuous functions are differentiable.
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
(p → r) ∧ q
Using the rules of negation, write the negation of the following:
(~p ∧ q) ∧ (~q ∨ ~r)
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p → q) ∨ (p → r)
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p → q) ∧ r
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ ~ q) ↔ (q → p)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(~p ∨ q) ∧ (~p ∧ ~q)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∧ r) → (p ∨ ~q)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∨ r) → ~(q ∧ r)
Construct the truth table for the following statement pattern.
(p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(p ∧ q) ∨ (~p)] ∨ [p ∧ (~ q)]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∨ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If 2 + 5 = 10, then 4 + 10 = 20.
Write the converse, inverse, contrapositive of the following statement.
If a man is bachelor, then he is happy.
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
(p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ~(p ∧ q)
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ ~[(p ∧ q) ∨ (r ∨ s)]
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
2 is even number or 9 is a perfect square.
Write the dual of the following.
(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)
Express the truth of the following statement by the Venn diagram.
Some members of the present Indian cricket are not committed.
The false statement in the following is ______.
Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.
“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”
Choose the correct alternative:
If p → q is an implication, then the implication ~q → ~p is called its
Write the dual of the following.
13 is prime number and India is a democratic country
If p → (∼p v q) is false, then the truth values of p and q are respectively
The statement pattern (p ∧ q) ∧ [~ r v (p ∧ q)] v (~ p ∧ q) is equivalent to ______.
Which of the following is not equivalent to p → q.
Which of the following is not true for any two statements p and q?
Using truth table verify that:
(p ∧ q)∨ ∼ q ≡ p∨ ∼ q
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency:
[(∼ p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∧ (∼ q)
Write the negation of the following statement:
(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)
Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:
(p→q)∧(p→r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency:
(∼p ∧ ∼q) → (p → q)
If p → q is true and p ∧ q is false, then the truth value of ∼p ∨ q is ______
The converse of contrapositive of ∼p → q is ______.
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p)
In the triangle PQR, `bar(PQ) = 2bara and bar(QR)` = `2 bar(b)` . The mid-point of PR is M. Find following vectors in terms of `bar(a) and bar(b)` .
- `bar(PR)`
- `bar(PM)`
- `bar(QM)`
Prepare truth table for the statement pattern `(p -> q) ∨ (q -> p)` and show that it is a tautology.
If p, q are true statements and r, s are false statements, then find the truth value of ∼ [(p ∧ ∼ r) ∨ (∼ q ∨ s)].
