Advertisements
Advertisements
प्रश्न
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[(~p ∧ q) ∧ (q ∧ r)] ∨ (~q)
उत्तर
| p | q | r | ~p | ~q | ~p∧q | q∧r | (~p∧q)∧(q∧r) | [(~p∧q)∧(q∧r)]∨(~q) |
| T | T | T | F | F | F | T | F | F |
| T | T | F | F | F | F | F | F | F |
| T | F | T | F | T | F | F | F | T |
| T | F | F | F | T | F | F | F | T |
| F | T | T | T | F | T | T | T | T |
| F | T | F | T | F | T | F | F | F |
| F | F | T | T | T | F | F | F | T |
| F | F | F | T | T | F | F | F | T |
Truth values in the last column are not identical. Hence, it is contingency.
Notes
The answer in the textbook is incorrect.
APPEARS IN
संबंधित प्रश्न
Prove that the following statement pattern is a tautology : ( q → p ) v ( p → q )
Show that the following statement pattern in contingency :
(~p v q) → [p ∧ (q v ~ q)]
Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement
5x - 3 < 10
Use the quantifiers to convert the following open sentence defined on N into true statement:
x2 ≥ 1
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Using the truth table prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(p → q) ↔ (∼ p ∨ q)
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology or a contradiction or a contingency.
(∼ p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r)
(p ∧ q) → r is logically equivalent to ________.
Inverse of statement pattern (p ∨ q) → (p ∧ q) is ________ .
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
(p ∧ q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ ∼q)
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction or contingency:
[(p ∨ ∼q) ∨ (∼p ∧ q)] ∧ r
Prepare truth table for (p ˄ q) ˅ ~ r
(p ∧ q) ∨ ~ r
Examine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, a contradiction or a contingency.
(~ q ∧ p) ∧ (p ∧ ~ p)
Fill in the blanks :
Inverse of statement pattern p ↔ q is given by –––––––––.
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p → q) ↔ (~ p ∨ q)
Show that the following statement pattern is contingency.
(p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Using the truth table, verify
p → (p → q) ≡ ~ q → (p → q)
Using the truth table, verify
~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ ~ p
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
p ↔ q and (p → q) ∧ (q → p)
Prove that the following pair of statement pattern is equivalent.
~(p ∧ q) and ~p ∨ ~q
Write the dual of the following:
(p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual of the following:
p ∨ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∨ r
Write the dual statement of the following compound statement.
A number is a real number and the square of the number is non-negative.
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p → q) ∨ (p → r)
With proper justification, state the negation of the following.
(p ↔ q) v (~ q → ~ r)
What is tautology? What is contradiction?
Show that the negation of a tautology is a contradiction and the negation of a contradiction is a tautology.
Determine whether the following statement pattern is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency.
[~(p ∧ q) → p] ↔ [(~p) ∧ (~q)]
Using the truth table, prove the following logical equivalence.
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
State the dual of the following statement by applying the principle of duality.
(p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~ p ∧ q) ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ~(p ∧ q)
Write the dual of the following.
(~p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (~p ∧ ~q)
Write the dual of the following.
(p ∧ q) ∧ r ≡ p ∧ (q ∧ r)
Write the converse and contrapositive of the following statements.
“If a function is differentiable then it is continuous”
Write the dual of the following
(p ˄ ∼q) ˅ (∼p ˄ q) ≡ (p ˅ q) ˄ ∼(p ˄ q)
Write the negation of the following statement:
(p `rightarrow` q) ∨ (p `rightarrow` r)
Show that the following statement pattern is a contingency:
(p→q)∧(p→r)
If p → q is true and p ∧ q is false, then the truth value of ∼p ∨ q is ______
